TMI Blog2023 (6) TMI 756X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... challenge by the Revenue to the order dated 22-3-2018 was limited to the question of penalty - HELD THAT:- The Tribunal, ultimately proceeded to reject the appeal by its order dated 9-11-2021. The said order dated 9-11-2021 was questioned by the appellant before the High Court in Central Excise Appeal No. 1 of 2022, which was considered and dismissed by the High Court by its order in M/S. MEGHALA ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Roy, JJ. Shri B. Lakshmi Narashimhan, Ms. Apeksha Mehta, Ms. Mounica Kasturi, Pranav Mundra, Falguni Gupta, Advocates and Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, AOR, for the Petitioner. ORDER In this appeal, reportedly time-barred by a period of 109 days, the appellant seeks to question the order dated 22-3-2018 passed by the Customs, Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Regional Benc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 18 was limited to the question of penalty. The Tribunal, ultimately proceeded to reject the appeal by its order dated 9-11-2021. The said order dated 9-11-2021 was questioned by the appellant before the High Court in Central Excise Appeal No. 1 of 2022, which was considered and dismissed by the High Court by its order dated 12-4-2022 [2022 (381) E.L.T. 594 (Meghalaya)] while again noticing the lim ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
