9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (12) TMI 416 - AT - Central Excise
Issues: Classification of silver waste and scrap under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Classification of silver waste and scrap under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The case involved the classification of silver waste and scrap cleared without payment of duty by the appellants during specific periods. The original adjudicating authority accepted the appellants' contention that the silver scraps were pure silver attracting nil rate of duty. However, on review, the Commissioner (Appeals) reversed this decision, classifying the silver waste and scrap under heading 7101.80, requiring duty payment. The appellants argued that the silver recovered from the vacuum chamber was pure silver, not waste or scrap. They presented reports from the job worker indicating the recovery of silver. The appellate authority rejected the appellants' arguments, emphasizing that the silver waste accumulated in the chamber was not pure and fell under heading 7101.80, attracting duty. The authority highlighted that the silver vapors settled in the chamber were waste and scrap, no longer fit for the original use, requiring recovery for conversion into silver scrap. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision, stating that the silver waste and scrap were classifiable under heading 7101.80, rejecting the appeal based on the nature and use of the recovered silver waste and scrap. In conclusion, the judgment focused on the classification of silver waste and scrap under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) that the silver waste accumulated in the chamber during the metallising process was classified under heading 7101.80, attracting duty payment. The appellants' argument that the recovered silver was pure silver and not waste or scrap was rejected, emphasizing that the recovered silver was no longer fit for the original use and required processing for recovery. The judgment highlighted the distinction between pure silver and waste and scrap, ultimately affirming the duty liability on the cleared silver waste and scrap.
|
