Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2003 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2003 (8) TMI 478 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Whether the processes of dyeing and printing of cloth fall within the ambit of the Maharashtra Sales Tax on the Transfer of Property in Goods involved in the Execution of Works Contracts (Re-enacted) Act, 1989.
2. Whether the activity in which the transfer of property in goods is too insignificant will attract the provisions of the said Act.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Applicability of the Works Contracts Act to Dyeing and Printing
The Tribunal initially held that the processes of dyeing and printing do not fall within the ambit of the Works Contracts Act because the transfer of property in goods is too insignificant. However, the High Court disagreed with this interpretation. The Court noted that the Forty-sixth Amendment to the Constitution introduced the concept of "deemed sale," which includes the transfer of property in goods in any form, whether physical or chemical.

The Court emphasized that the coloured shade passed to the fabrics due to the chemical reaction of the materials used in dyeing constitutes a transfer of property in goods. This transfer is considered a "deemed sale" under the Works Contracts Act. Therefore, the processes of dyeing and printing do fall within the ambit of the Works Contracts Act.

Issue 2: Insignificant Transfer of Property in Goods
The Tribunal had also held that the activity of dyeing and printing, where the transfer of property in goods is too insignificant, does not attract the provisions of the Works Contracts Act. The High Court found this interpretation incorrect. The Court clarified that under the Works Contracts Act, the relevant factor is the passing of property in goods, not the quantity of the property that passes.

The Court pointed out that the entire property of the materials used in dyeing and printing is transferred to the fabrics, and what remains is merely residue or waste. Therefore, the Act applies regardless of the quantity of the property transferred. The Court held that the Tribunal was not justified in excluding the applicability of the Works Contracts Act based on the insignificance of the transferred property.

Conclusion:
The High Court concluded that the processes of dyeing and printing of cloth do fall within the ambit of the Maharashtra Sales Tax on the Transfer of Property in Goods involved in the Execution of Works Contracts (Re-enacted) Act, 1989. The Court also held that the insignificance of the transferred property does not exclude the applicability of the Act. Both questions were answered in the negative, in favor of the Revenue and against the respondents. The reference was disposed of with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates