9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Deduction of wealth-tax liability in computing taxable wealth. Analysis: The High Court of Madhya Pradesh was presented with a reference under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act regarding the deduction of wealth-tax liabilities in computing the taxable wealth of the assessee. The dispute arose as the Wealth-tax Officer did not allow these liabilities, arguing they were not quantified on the valuation dates or accepted by the assessee. The Commissioner of Wealth-tax (Appeals) only allowed deduction for undisputed wealth-tax liabilities. The Tribunal, however, held that wealth-tax liability crystallizes on the valuation date, and debts owed by the assessee can be deducted. The Tribunal disagreed with the Commissioner's decision and allowed deduction for all wealth-tax liabilities. The Tribunal's decision was supported by valid reasons and authorities. The Revenue, during the hearing, conceded that the question should be answered in favor of the assessee based on Supreme Court decisions. The Supreme Court rulings in CWT v. K. S. N. Bhatt, CWT v. Vadilal Lallubhai, and CWT v. Vimlaben Vadilal Mehta were cited. These cases emphasized that liabilities towards income-tax, wealth-tax, and gift-tax that crystallize on the valuation date should be deducted, even if the assessment orders are finalized after the valuation date. The quantification of tax liability by the ultimate judicial authority determines the debt owed by the assessee on the valuation date. Rectification of an assessment is treated the same as an original assessment for claiming deductions. Even if tax liabilities are created after the wealth-tax assessment order, they should be considered for deduction as if made in the original assessment proceedings. Based on these precedents, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee and against the Department. The question referred to the court was answered in favor of the assessee, and the reference was concluded with no order as to costs.
|
