9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (2) TMI 930 - AT - Service TaxStay of impugned order - Refund of service tax paid on certain construction activities carried out by them during the period 01.04.2015 to 29.02.2016 - Held that - The learned Commissioner (Appeals), vide the impugned order, has remanded the matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication of the refund claim filed by the respondent. Inasmuch as this is only remand, we find no reason to interfere with the same. The original authority is directed to pass de novo orders in respect of the refund claim filed by respondent on the basis of law without getting influenced by the observations made in the impugned order - appeal disposed off.
Issues:
Refund claim on service tax paid for construction activities - Eligibility of exemption for services provided to universities. Analysis: The appeal and stay application were filed by the Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. 692/2017, where the respondent, engaged in construction activities, sought a refund of service tax paid on specific construction work. The original authority partially allowed the refund, granting it for services to Government Departments but denying it for services to universities. The Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the issue back to the original authority for fresh adjudication. The main ground of appeal by Revenue was the eligibility of exemption for services to universities. During the hearing, both sides were heard, and it was decided that the appeal would be disposed of without granting a stay on the impugned order. The Commissioner (Appeals) had remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, and the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with this decision. The original authority was directed to reevaluate the refund claim without being influenced by the previous order, ensuring the respondent is given adequate opportunities for a fair hearing. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of, along with the stay application. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh adjudication based on the law, without prejudice from past observations, to determine the eligibility of the refund claim for services provided to universities.
|
