Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2018 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (7) TMI 281 - HC - Customs


Issues:
Appeal against rejection of Miscellaneous Application by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal - Interpretation of amended provisions of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 - Compliance with pre-deposit requirement - Consideration of CBEC Instructions dated 16.09.2014 - Existence of substantial question of law for maintaining appeal before High Court.

Analysis:
The Appeals were filed by the Assessee against the rejection of the Miscellaneous Application by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Assessee sought to have their Appeal entertained based on the amended provisions of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, which required a 10% pre-deposit of the disputed custom duty amount. Despite previous orders reducing the pre-deposit amount, the Assessee persisted in approaching the Tribunal and the High Court. The Assessee failed to mention the amendment of Section 129E in the Miscellaneous Application filed on 29.09.2014, and the CBEC Instructions dated 16.09.2014 were not brought to the notice of the Tribunal initially.

The Tribunal, in its Order on 11.02.2016, noted that the CBEC Instructions were not presented by either party but considered the Assessee's submission that their 7.5% deposit of a reduced amount should suffice for compliance. The Tribunal rejected this request, leading to the Assessee's Appeal before the High Court. The Assessee's counsel argued for considering the CBEC Instructions regarding deposits made during investigation and assessment, in line with the amended provisions of Section 129E.

After hearing both parties, the High Court observed that the Assessee had prolonged the litigation unnecessarily by not informing the Tribunal about the legal amendments and CBEC Instructions. The Court noted the repeated approaches to different forums and the lack of substantial legal questions in the case. The Appeals were dismissed, with the Court emphasizing the need for compliance with pre-deposit requirements and leaving it open for the Assessee to seek further directions from the Tribunal.

In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the Appeals, highlighting the importance of timely compliance with legal requirements and the lack of substantial legal questions in the case. The Assessee was advised to address the pre-deposit issue directly with the Tribunal for further guidance.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates