Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2018 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (9) TMI 290 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Assessment of total income
2. Existence of Permanent Establishment (PE)
3. Calculation of total tax payable
4. Levying of interest under sections 234D and 234B
5. Penalty proceedings under section 271B

Assessment of Total Income:
The appeal was against the Order of the Assistant Director of Income Tax, challenging the assessment of total income at ?10,823,460 instead of the NIL income declared by the Assessee. The Disputes Resolution Panel directed the assessment based on objections raised by the Assessee. The A.O. computed the profit at 10% and assessed the income accordingly.

Existence of Permanent Establishment (PE):
The Assessee argued against being considered having a fixed place of business in India, leading to the establishment of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India. The Assessee contended that as per the India - Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, there was no PE in India, hence the income from contracts should not be taxed in India.

Calculation of Total Tax Payable:
Issues were raised regarding the calculation of total tax payable, with the Assessee disputing the inclusion of a refund already paid in the computation. The matter was set aside for verification by the A.O. to ensure accuracy in the tax payable calculation and its impact on interest under sections 234D and 234B.

Levying of Interest and Penalty Proceedings:
The A.O. levied interest under sections 234D and 234B, which was contested by the Assessee. Additionally, penalty proceedings under section 271B were initiated, with the Assessee arguing against the penalty imposition due to a genuine belief regarding the maintenance of accounts as per the tax treaty.

Judgment:
The Assessee withdrew certain grounds of appeal to avoid prolonged litigation. Grounds related to tax calculation were set aside for A.O. verification. The challenge against penalty proceedings was dismissed as a separate proceeding. The appeal was allowed partly for statistical purposes, with specific grounds being allowed or dismissed accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates