1975 (6) TMI 15 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
- Whether the interest received by the assessee on the deposit made with the bank was income exempt from tax under section 10(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961?

Detailed Analysis:
The case involved the interpretation of section 10(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the taxability of interest received by the assessee on the deposit made with a bank. The company, in this case, had issued shares that were oversubscribed, resulting in excess application money being deposited in a call deposit account with a bank. The interest earned on this deposit was the subject of contention regarding its taxability.

The Income-tax Officer initially rejected the assessee's contention that the interest income was exempt under section 10(3) as casual and non-recurring. The officer allowed an expenditure of Rs. 7,000 and taxed the net sum of Rs. 2,41,180 as income under "Other sources." On appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that the interest was of a casual and non-recurring nature due to the unforeseen over-subscription, exempting it from tax and disallowing related expenses.

However, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal overturned the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's decision, stating that while the oversubscription might be casual, the interest earned on the excess deposit was not casual or non-recurring. The Tribunal directed a reassessment of allowable expenses related to earning the interest income.

The High Court analyzed the provisions of the Companies Act requiring the deposit of application money in a scheduled bank and the subsequent interest accrual. The court emphasized that the interest earned on the deposit could not be considered casual or non-recurring as it was a known consequence of depositing money in a bank account, contrary to the requirements for exemption under section 10(3).

The court distinguished previous cases cited by the assessee, concluding that the interest income was not exempt from tax under section 10(3) as it was neither casual nor non-recurring. Both judges concurred that the interest received on the deposit was taxable income, answering the referred question in the negative against the assessee.

In summary, the judgment clarified that the interest earned on the excess application money deposited in a bank account was not exempt from tax under section 10(3) as it did not meet the criteria of being casual and non-recurring income, based on the provisions of the Companies Act and the nature of interest accrual in such accounts.