Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2022 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (11) TMI 688 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax


Issues: Challenge to orders dated 31.01.2020 regarding interstate sales in 2013-14; Petitioner's need to establish the occurrence of interstate sales; Production of necessary documents by the petitioner; Assessment by the assessing officer within eight weeks; Extension of limitation period under DVAT Act, 2004.

Analysis:
1. The writ petition challenges orders dated 31.01.2020 concerning interstate sales in the first, second, and fourth quarters of 2013-14, along with penalty orders dated 03.02.2020. The central issue is whether the petitioner engaged in interstate sales during the subject period.

2. Despite various legal arguments raised in the petition, both parties agree on the following terms for disposal: setting aside the impugned orders, petitioner providing essential documents to prove interstate sales/branch transfers, such as stock register, audited balance sheet, DVAT-31 Form, C and F Forms, bank statements, and purchase/tax invoices.

3. The petitioner is required to present the mentioned documents to establish the occurrence of interstate sales, aiding the assessing officer in determining the accuracy of the claim. Additionally, the petitioner may need to produce original local purchase invoices, goods receipts, and copies of RCs of purchasing dealers to support the movement of goods.

4. The assessing officer is directed to allow the petitioner to submit all necessary evidence to support their position. Affidavits from transporters and goods recipients can be provided if deemed essential, with the officer having the authority to summon the affiants if required.

5. The assessing officer must complete the evaluation within eight weeks, and the petitioner's representative should appear before the officer on a specified date. If the assessment is unfavorable to the petitioner, they retain the right to challenge it in accordance with the law.

6. Importantly, the directions provided extend the limitation period as per Section 34(2) of the DVAT Act, 2004. The writ petition is resolved based on the outlined terms, and any pending applications will be closed accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates