Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2001 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2001 (2) TMI 148 - HC - Central Excise

Issues:
I. Whether the Tribunal was correct in allowing adjustment of duty paid under Rule 57F(1)(ii) from the whole demand.
II. Whether the Tribunal was correct in allowing credit in respect of foundry chemicals, Hydraulic Jacks, Transformers under Rule 57A of Central Excise Rules.

Analysis:

Issue I: Adjustment of Duty Paid under Rule 57F(1)(ii)
The case involved M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) availing higher notional credit under Rule 57B of Central Excise Rules by clearing inputs under Rule 57F(1)(ii) for job work. The Revenue alleged misuse of provisions and issued show cause notices disallowing higher notional credit. The Commissioner imposed penalties and disallowed credits. CEGAT upheld demands, ordered duty adjustment, and reduced penalties. The High Court analyzed the conduct of BHEL, duty payment, and the Tribunal's decision. It concluded that BHEL paid duty on inputs under Rule 57F(1)(ii), thus allowing duty adjustment was fair. The Tribunal's decision for differential duty computation was upheld.

Issue II: Credit on Foundry Chemicals, Hydraulic Jacks, Transformers
Regarding Modvat credit on foundry chemicals, the Revenue argued against their use as inputs for final products. The High Court referred to precedents and ruled in favor of BHEL, stating foundry chemicals were essential for sand moulds used in manufacturing, thus eligible for credit. Similarly, Hydraulic Jacks and Transformers were deemed modvatable items due to their role in handling and electricity supply, respectively. The High Court dismissed Revenue's challenges on these items based on relevant legal interpretations.

In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the Revenue's challenge on Modvat credit and duty adjustment, upholding the Tribunal's decision. The judgment clarified the eligibility of foundry chemicals, Hydraulic Jacks, and Transformers for credit under Rule 57A. The legal analysis provided a thorough examination of the issues raised and applied relevant legal principles to resolve the matter effectively.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates