1985 (5) TMI 85 - AT - Income Tax

Issues Involved:
1. Adjustment of unabsorbed development rebate for the assessment year 1972-73 against the income of the assessment year 1979-80.
2. Impact of nationalisation of the coal mining business on the entitlement to carry forward and set off the unabsorbed development rebate.
3. Interpretation of relevant sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961, especially sections 33, 34, and 72, in relation to the carry forward and set off of development rebate.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Adjustment of Unabsorbed Development Rebate:
The main issue in this appeal is whether the unabsorbed development rebate from the assessment year 1972-73 can be adjusted against the income of the assessment year 1979-80. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the adjustment, holding that the assessee was entitled to set off the unabsorbed development rebate against the income computed for the assessment year 1979-80. The Commissioner reasoned that the development rebate is a concession to the assessee to incentivize business development and should not be denied based on assumptions or terms not specified in the Act. The relevant sections, such as section 33(2), indicate that the development rebate is to be set off against the total income of the assessee, not just the profits of the particular business in which it initially arose.

2. Impact of Nationalisation:
The revenue argued that the nationalisation of the coal mining business under the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973, meant that the business for which the development rebate was initially granted ceased to exist, and thus the rebate could not be carried forward. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal found that the nationalisation did not affect the carry forward of the development rebate. Section 7(1) of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act specifies that liabilities of the business prior to nationalisation remain with the original owner, not the government. Therefore, the colliery business did not cease to exist for the purposes of the development rebate, and the assessee continued to exist and earn income from other sources.

3. Interpretation of Relevant Sections:
The Tribunal examined sections 33, 34, and 72 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 33(2)(ii) allows the carry forward of unabsorbed development rebate to subsequent years, to be set off against the total income of the assessee. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court decision in Rajapalayam Mills Ltd. v. CIT, which clarified that unabsorbed development rebate could be set off against other income of the assessee, not just the income from the specific business. The Tribunal concluded that the allowance of development rebate is not linked to the continuance of the specific business in which it initially arose, supporting the assessee's claim for adjustment.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), allowing the adjustment of the unabsorbed development rebate from the assessment year 1972-73 against the income of the assessment year 1979-80. The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal, affirming that the nationalisation of the coal mining business did not negate the assessee's entitlement to carry forward and set off the unabsorbed development rebate. The Tribunal emphasized the interpretation of fiscal statutes in favor of the taxpayer, where any ambiguity exists.

← Previous Next →