Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 1980 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1980 (3) TMI 118 - AT - Income Tax

Issues:
1. Determination of Gross Profit Rate
2. Disallowance of car expenses and depreciation
3. Disallowance of cash shortage amount

Analysis:

1. Determination of Gross Profit Rate:
The assessee, a registered firm dealing in cloth, disclosed a lower Gross Profit (G.P.) rate for the assessment year 1975-76 compared to the preceding year. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) rejected the assessee's submissions regarding the reasons for the decline in the G.P. rate and made an addition to the income. Upon appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC), some relief was granted, but the assessee was still aggrieved. The Tribunal considered the submissions made by both parties and found that the proviso to section 145(1) was rightly applied due to the absence of stock details. The Tribunal upheld the addition made by the AAC, concluding that the estimate of sales and G.P. was reasonable based on the assessee's own estimates and historical G.P. rates.

2. Disallowance of Car Expenses and Depreciation:
The second ground of appeal related to the disallowance of car expenses and depreciation claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal noted that only one car was maintained by the firm for two partners, and personal use of the car was acknowledged. Considering the circumstances and turnover of the assessee, the Tribunal decided to disallow one-fourth of the claimed expenditure and depreciation, finding it to be a reasonable adjustment.

3. Disallowance of Cash Shortage Amount:
The final ground of appeal concerned the disallowance of a sum on account of a difference in cash. The Tribunal reviewed the details of shortage and excess in cash provided by the assessee and referred to relevant judgments regarding business expenditures. After considering the explanations provided by the assessee, the Tribunal concluded that the shortage in cash was incidental to the business operations and allowed the expenditure. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.

In conclusion, the Tribunal addressed the issues of determining the Gross Profit Rate, disallowance of car expenses and depreciation, and the disallowance of cash shortage amount in a comprehensive manner, providing reasoning for each decision based on the facts and submissions presented during the proceedings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates