9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the entries in the assessee-trust's account books debiting the donors with the amount of donations and crediting the amounts to the account of Atma Ram Sanatan Dharam College amounted to receipt of donations when the assessee was following the mercantile system of accounting. 2. Whether the Tribunal was bound to follow its own earlier order for the assessment year 1977-78. 3. Whether Rs. 2.70 lakhs was assessable as income in the hands of the assessee-trust for the assessment year under appeal. Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Receipt of Donations and Method of Accounting: The primary issue was whether the entries in the assessee-trust's account books debiting the donors with the amount of donations and crediting the amounts to the account of Atma Ram Sanatan Dharam College amounted to receipt of donations when the assessee was following the mercantile system of accounting. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) observed that the assessee had credited the donations of Rs. 2.70 lakhs as income in its books, thus treating it as received under the mercantile system. The Commissioner (Appeals) accepted the assessee's contention that the donations were not actually received and thus should not be considered income. The Tribunal, however, noted that the factual position required further examination, particularly the accounts of the donors and the recipient college to determine if the funds were actually received. The Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the ITO for a thorough investigation to determine whether the donations were received and constituted the income of the assessee-trust. 2. Binding Nature of Earlier Tribunal Order: The second issue was whether the Tribunal was bound to follow its own earlier order for the assessment year 1977-78. The Judicial Member argued that the facts of the case had not changed from the previous year, and thus the Tribunal should follow its earlier order, which had ruled in favor of the assessee. However, the Accountant Member noted new factual data for the assessment year 1978-79 that was not available in the earlier year, justifying a different approach. The Third Member agreed with the Accountant Member, stating that while the principle of res judicata does not strictly apply to tax proceedings, the Tribunal should not depart from its earlier findings without cogent reasons. However, new material facts justified a fresh investigation. 3. Assessability of Rs. 2.70 Lakhs as Income: The third issue was whether the amount of Rs. 2.70 lakhs was assessable as income in the hands of the assessee-trust for the assessment year under appeal. The ITO had treated the entire amount as taxable income, while the Commissioner (Appeals) had deleted this addition. The Judicial Member held that donations 'receivable' could not be treated as income, emphasizing that the substance of the matter was that the donations had not been received. The Accountant Member, however, pointed out that the donations were credited in the books and suggested that the accounts of both donors and the recipient college should be examined to determine the actual receipt of funds. The Third Member agreed with the Accountant Member's approach, noting that a thorough investigation was necessary to establish whether the donations were received and thus assessable as income. Conclusion: The Tribunal decided to restore the matter to the file of the ITO for fresh investigation and decision, emphasizing the need to examine the accounts of the donors and the recipient college to determine the actual receipt of the donations. This decision was based on the new factual data available for the assessment year 1978-79, which justified a departure from the Tribunal's earlier order for the assessment year 1977-78. The appeal by the revenue was thus deemed to be allowed for further examination.
|
