9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Valuation of closing stock, Allowance of Rs. 10,000, Depreciation on diesel engine
Valuation of Closing Stock: The main issue in this appeal was the valuation of the closing stock of paddy and broken rice by the assessee, a registered firm running a rice mill. The Income-tax Officer proposed an increase in the valuation of the closing stock of paddy and broken rice based on the ruling price and average sale price, respectively. The assessee contended that they followed the average cost method for years and argued for the acceptance of this method. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the addition for paddy but allowed relief for broken rice. The assessee appealed, emphasizing the recognition of various valuation methods in accounting principles. The Bombay High Court and Madras High Court decisions were cited in support of the average cost method. The department argued against the scientific validity of the average purchase price method when stock purchases are easily identifiable. However, the tribunal agreed with the assessee, recognizing multiple accepted methods for valuing closing stock, including the weighted average cost method, and held that the method followed by the assessee was acceptable. The tribunal also highlighted the importance of considering the entire stock purchased during the year for valuation purposes. Allowance of Rs. 10,000: The next issue concerned an allowance of Rs. 10,000 related to an employee's advances for traveling expenses. The employee, who had been with the firm for several years, had taken advances for business-related travel. A portion of the advance was written off due to personal reasons, specifically for the marriage of the employee's daughter. The Income-tax Officer and Commissioner disallowed the deduction, considering it unrelated to business. However, the tribunal disagreed, noting the employee's long-standing service, inadequate salary, and the customary practice of making presents during significant personal events. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the deduction, considering it a legitimate business expense. Depreciation on Diesel Engine: The final issue revolved around the depreciation claim for a diesel engine fitted to a motor car. The department disallowed the depreciation due to the lack of proof of purchase or installation of the diesel engine, as no bills were provided. Consequently, both the Income-tax Officer and Commissioner denied the deduction. The tribunal concurred with this decision, stating that the absence of evidence regarding the purchase and installation of the diesel engine justified the disallowance of depreciation. As a result, the tribunal partly allowed the appeal, addressing the valuation of closing stock and the allowance of Rs. 10,000 while upholding the denial of depreciation on the diesel engine.
|
