9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Whether the income derived from letting out certain premises would be exempt under section 80P(2)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Analysis: The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur dealt with a departmental appeal concerning the exemption of income derived from letting out premises under section 80P(2)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a cooperative society engaged in ginning and pressing of cotton, had let out premises to various tenants, including shopkeepers. The total rent received was divided between rent from non-shop tenants and shopkeepers. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed the exemption claim for the rent received from shopkeepers, stating that the premises did not qualify as warehouses and the commodities stored were not connected to the cooperative society's activities. The Commissioner (Appeals) referred to a previous Tribunal decision regarding rent received from the Apex Body of the cooperative society and applied a similar principle to the current case. The department, in its appeal, argued that the tenants, mainly shopkeepers, were not dealing with commodities connected to the society's activities. The department relied on a Gujarat High Court decision emphasizing that the exemption under section 80P(2)(e) applies only to income derived from letting of godowns or warehouses used for storage, processing, or facilitating the marketing of commodities related to the cooperative society's operations. The Tribunal analyzed the conditions for exemption under section 80P(2)(e), requiring income to be derived from letting of godowns or warehouses used for storage, processing, or facilitating the marketing of commodities. The Tribunal rejected the argument that shops could be considered as warehouses based on dictionary definitions, emphasizing the distinction between storage and sale premises. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the premises let out to shopkeepers did not meet the requirement of being used solely for storage of commodities, as they primarily served as retail spaces for customer purchases. The Tribunal upheld the department's appeal, emphasizing that the exemption provision of section 80P(2)(e) applies specifically to income derived from letting of godowns or warehouses for storage, processing, or facilitating the marketing of relevant commodities. The previous Tribunal decision regarding rent from the Apex Body was deemed inapplicable to the current case, as the connection between the activities of the cooperative society and the tenants was crucial for exemption eligibility. Consequently, the Tribunal restored the ITO's order, disallowing the exemption claim for the income derived from letting out premises to shopkeepers.
|
