9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to Notification No. 173/77-Cus. 2. Entitlement to Notification No. 341/76-Cus. 3. Classification of imported goods as aluminium slugs or circles. 4. Limitation period for issuing a review show cause notice. Detailed Analysis: 1. Entitlement to Notification No. 173/77-Cus. The primary issue was whether the imported goods, described as "aluminium circles punched out of aluminium sheets/strips," qualified for the benefit under Notification No. 173/77-Cus. The Appellate Collector had previously ruled that the goods should be classified as circles, even with a hole punched in the center, thus qualifying for the notification. However, the Tribunal disagreed, noting that the goods were in fact aluminium slugs, not circles. The Tribunal referred to ISI Specifications (IS - 5047), which differentiate between slugs and circles. A slug is defined as a blank prepared for impact extrusion, whereas a circle is simply a blank that is circular in shape. The presence of a hole in the center of the imported goods rendered them slugs, not circles. Therefore, the goods did not meet the criteria outlined in Notification No. 173/77-Cus, which exempts aluminium manufactures such as plates, sheets, circles, strips, and foil containing more than 97% aluminium. 2. Entitlement to Notification No. 341/76-Cus. The second issue was whether the imported goods qualified for the benefit under Notification No. 341/76-Cus. The Appellate Collector had ruled that the goods, being circles, fell under the category of plates and sheets, thus qualifying for the notification. The Tribunal, however, found that this classification was incorrect. The goods were slugs, which are distinct from circles, plates, and sheets. The Tribunal emphasized that if the Government had intended for slugs to be included in the notification, it would have explicitly mentioned them. Therefore, the goods did not qualify for the benefit under Notification No. 341/76-Cus. 3. Classification of Imported Goods as Aluminium Slugs or Circles The classification of the imported goods was a crucial issue. The Appellate Collector had classified the goods as circles, but the Tribunal found that they were actually slugs. The Tribunal referred to the ISI Specifications, which clearly distinguish between slugs and circles. A slug is a blank prepared for impact extrusion, whereas a circle is a blank that is circular in shape. The presence of a hole in the center of the imported goods rendered them slugs, not circles. 4. Limitation Period for Issuing a Review Show Cause Notice The issue of whether the review show cause notice was time-barred was also raised. The respondents argued that the notice, issued on 6-3-1982, was time-barred as the refund was received on 18-9-1981. The Tribunal, however, relied on its earlier order in Collector of Customs, Bombay v. M/s. May & Baker (India) Ltd., which examined a similar situation and held that the show cause notice was not hit by limitation. Conclusion The Tribunal concluded that the imported goods were aluminium slugs and not circles. As such, they did not qualify for the benefits under Notification No. 173/77-Cus or Notification No. 341/76-Cus. The appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed, and the Tribunal held that the show cause notice was not time-barred. The Appellate Collector's order granting the benefits of the notifications to the respondents was set aside.
|
