1999 (2) TMI 147 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues: Classification of products under Chapter Heading 3204.29 vs. 32.15

Detailed Analysis:
1. Background: The appeal was filed concerning the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune dated 31-5-1994.
2. Classification Dispute: The appellants classified their products, including ink blue, under Chapter 3215.00, but a show cause notice raised the issue of classification under Chapter Heading 3204.30 and 3204.29.
3. Adjudication Process: The A.C. classified the products as synthetic organic dyes under Chapter Heading 3204.21 or 3204.29, which was upheld by the Collector (Appeals). The case was remanded back to the A.C. by CEGAT, Bombay for re-testing and further consideration.
4. Appellate Stage: The appellants accepted the Dy. Chief Chemist's report but argued that their product, ink blue, should be classified as ink under Heading 32.15 based on chief characteristics.
5. Reasoning: The Collector (Appeals) rejected this argument, stating that the product was a synthetic organic dyestuff used as an ingredient in ink production, not ink itself. The Heading 32.15 did not cover ingredients for ink production.
6. Precedent: The issue was compared to a similar case in CCE, Calcutta v. Bengal Aromatics, where the classification was upheld.
7. Appellants' Contentions: The appellants emphasized that their product, ink blue, should be classified under Heading 32.15 based on chapter notes and rules of interpretation, citing various Tribunal decisions and technical expert reports.
8. Decision: The Tribunal upheld the order of the Collector (Appeals), stating that the material, being an organic synthetic dyestuff used as an ingredient for ink, should be classified under Chapter Heading 3204.29, in line with previous Tribunal orders and HSN explanatory notes.

This detailed analysis covers the classification dispute between Chapter Heading 3204.29 and 32.15, highlighting the arguments, reasoning, precedents, and final decision rendered by the Tribunal.