9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Classification of imported waste oil under the Customs Tariff Act. 2. Applicability of countervailing duty on the imported waste oil. 3. Imposition of penalty and fine on the importers. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Classification of Imported Waste Oil: The primary issue in the appeals was whether the waste oil imported by the importers should be classified under Heading 38.23 of the Customs Tariff Act (CTA) or under Heading 34.03 as Waste Lubricating Oil. The Assistant Collector classified the product under sub-heading 3403.19 of CTA, confirming the demand for customs duty by holding that the product was primarily a petroleum oil-based product with the characteristics of lubricating oil. The Collector (Appeals) upheld this classification, noting that the predominant constituent was mineral oil with a flash point of 94^0C. The Additional Collector, however, classified the waste oil under Heading 38.23, noting that the product was not suitable for direct use as lubricating oil and was a residue collected from machinery/plant. Upon consideration, it was noted that the imported oils were waste oils drained from industrial systems, containing less than 70% hydrocarbon oil by weight and having a flash point above 94^0C. Previous Tribunal decisions (Gujarat Oil Industries v. C.C., 1994 and Paramount Petrochemicals v. C.C., 1994) classified waste oils based on mineral oil content and flash point. Given that the imported waste oils in this case had less than 70% mineral oil content and a flash point above 94^0C, the Tribunal concluded that the waste oils should be classified under Heading 34.03. 2. Applicability of Countervailing Duty: The importers argued that countervailing duty should not be applicable as the waste oil was not a product of manufacturing activity. The Tribunal found that in the appeals by M/s. Continental Petroleum Ltd., no averment was made about the non-levy of additional duty of customs. The appeal petition suggested that waste oils should be classified under Heading 38.23 with relevant notifications. Consequently, such a contention could not be raised at the hearing stage. Similarly, M/s. Gujarat Oil and Industries did not take the plea of non-applicability of additional duty in their cross-objection, and thus, could not raise this point at this stage. 3. Imposition of Penalty and Fine: The Additional Collector had imposed a fine of Rs. 2,50,000 and a penalty of Rs. 25,000 on M/s. Gujarat Oil and Industries Ltd. for importing waste oil under OGL Appendix 6(1)(iii) of the Import Export Policy, which was found liable to confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. The importers argued that they were under the bona fide impression that they were entitled to import raw materials required for manufacturing goods as actual users under OGL. The Tribunal did not find any reason to enhance the penalty imposed by the Additional Collector, considering the facts and circumstances of the case. Conclusion: The appeals filed by M/s. Continental Petroleum Ltd. were rejected, and the appeal filed by the Revenue was disposed of in the above terms. The cross-objections filed by the respondents were also disposed of accordingly. The classification of the imported waste oils was confirmed under Heading 34.03, and the penalties imposed were upheld without enhancement.
|
