Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2000 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2000 (5) TMI 757 - AT - Central Excise

Issues Involved:
1. Excisability of molten iron
2. Eligibility of pig iron for exemption under Notification 281/87-C.E.
3. Liability of uncoated non-alloy steel plates under Notification 217/86

Excisability of Molten Iron:
The Tribunal, following a previous decision and a Supreme Court confirmation, ruled that molten iron, maintained at a high temperature for further use, is not in a marketable condition and hence not excisable. The Tribunal relied on the case of TISCO v. Commr. of Central Excise and dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this issue.

Eligibility of Pig Iron for Exemption:
The Tribunal, based on a previous decision in the respondent's own case, held that pig iron used captively in manufacturing machinery parts for repairs and maintenance, qualifies for exemption under Notification 281/86. Despite the creation of intermediate castings and forgings, the pig iron was deemed eligible for the exemption.

Liability of Uncoated Non-Alloy Steel Plates:
In a previous case, the Tribunal had denied the benefit of exemption under Notification 217/86 for uncoated non-alloy steel plates used in manufacturing splashed plates. However, the respondent argued that splashed plates were essentially steel plates cut to size and used in a specific manner. The respondent presented new facts and referred to a relevant circular, which were not considered earlier. The Tribunal found these new facts relevant and decided to remand the issue to the Assistant Commissioner for a fresh decision based on the additional information provided.

In conclusion, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeals concerning the first and second issues but remanded the third issue to the Assistant Commissioner for a fresh decision. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates