9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Confiscation of seized silver and scooter - Imposition of personal penalties - Benefit of doubt based on evidence and statements Confiscation of Seized Silver and Scooter: The case involved the interception of two individuals riding a scooter carrying silver bullion. The appellants, including the scooter owner, were issued show-cause notices for the confiscation of the silver and scooter, along with personal penalties. The Additional Commissioner of Customs ordered the confiscation and imposed penalties. However, the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) allowed the appeals, citing the dispute over the origin of the seized silver pieces. The Commissioner noted that proper documents were produced at the time of interception, indicating legal acquisition. The appellants argued the silver belonged to a specific jeweler, supported by challans and accounts. The Commissioner found no evidence of contraband character and concluded that the appellants were entitled to the benefit of doubt. The Revenue failed to dispute the authenticity of the documents and relied solely on retracted statements, leading to the rejection of their appeals. Imposition of Personal Penalties: Personal penalties were imposed on the individuals involved based on the initial order by the Additional Commissioner of Customs. However, the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) overturned these penalties, considering the lack of substantial evidence to support the statements made by the intercepted individuals. The retracted statements and absence of corroborative material reduced the evidentiary value of the statements, leading to the extension of the benefit of doubt to the appellants. The Commissioner highlighted the failure of the Revenue to provide any technical opinion supporting their claims of foreign markings on the silver pieces being erased, further justifying the rejection of the penalties. Benefit of Doubt Based on Evidence and Statements: The core issue revolved around the credibility of the evidence and statements presented in the case. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) emphasized the importance of the documents produced by the appellants, which indicated legal acquisition of the silver bullion. The Commissioner found that the intercepted individuals' retracted statements lacked evidentiary value, especially without additional corroboration. The absence of foreign markings on the silver pieces, coupled with the lack of technical evidence supporting the Revenue's claims, reinforced the decision to grant the benefit of doubt to the appellants. Ultimately, the rejection of the Revenue's appeals was justified based on the Commissioner's thorough analysis of the evidence and statements presented in the case.
|
