Article Section | |||||||||||
Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal Experts This |
|||||||||||
GST APPEALS UNDER SECTION 107 AND AMNESTY SCHEME |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
GST APPEALS UNDER SECTION 107 AND AMNESTY SCHEME |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
GST implemented in India is a dual GST i.e. to say every supply attracting the levy will be leviable to both Central tax and State tax. So does this mean that if a taxpayer is aggrieved by any such transaction, he will have to approach both the authorities for exercising his right of appeal? The answer is a plain NO. The Act makes provisions for cross empowerment between CGST and SGST/UTGST officers so as to ensure that if a proper officer of one Act (say, CGST) passes an order with respect to a transaction, he will also act as the proper officer of SGST for the same transaction and issue the order with respect to the CGST as well as the SGST/UTGST component of the same transaction. The Act also provides that where a proper officer under one Act (say, CGST) has passed an order, any appeal/review/ revision/rectification against the said order will lie only with the proper officers of that Act only (CGST Act). So also if any order is passed by the proper officer of SGST, any appeal/review /revision /rectification will lie with the proper officer of SGST only. Appeal to Appellate Authority (a) Who can file appeal – Any person aggrieved or Department on direction of commissioner (b) Order appealed against – Any decision or order passed by an adjudicating authority under the Act (c) Adjournments – A maximum of three adjournments may be allowed. (d) Time limit to file appeal – 3 months from date of communication of order; delay of upto 1 month condonable; 6 months in case of Departmental Appeal (e) Pre-deposit for filing of appeal – 10% of amount in dispute; 25% in case of penalty under section 129(3) of CGST Act, 2017; 12.5% under special Amnesty Scheme (e) Number of adjournments allowed in hearing – Upto 3 adjournments can be granted for hearing the appeal after recording reasons in writing (f) Time limit to decide appeal –Appeal may be decided within a period of one year from the date of filing. (g) Remand allowed – No remand to adjudicating authority is allowed. Adjudicating Authority Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, provides provisions for preferring an appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority to the Appellate Authority. Section 2(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 defines adjudicating authority to mean any authority, appointed or authorized to pass any order or decision under this Act. However, following are not covered under the ambit of adjudicating authority:
Hence, an order passed by any officer other than the revisionary authority as well as other authorities mentioned above could be contested before the Appellate Authority. Appellate Authority ‘Appellate Authority’ has been defined to means:
The appellate authority in terms of section 2(8) and 107 of CGST Act, 2017 shall carry out the following functions / obligations:
Time limit for filing appeal [Section 107(1), (2)] Every appeal to appellate authority shall be filed within three months from the date on which the decision or order sought to be appealed against is communicated to the person preferring the appeal. The period of three months shall be reckoned from date of communication of order and not from the date of issuance or dispatch of order. In case of an appeal filed by the department on the basis of the directions by the Commissioner shall have to be filed within 6 months from date of communication of the decision or order. Condonation of Delay (COD) [Section 107(4)] The appellate authority may, if satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the appeal within the aforesaid period of three months, allow it to be presented within a further period of one month. With the extension of period by one more month, appellant gets four months’ time but the extension is at the discretion of the appellate authority based on sufficient cause being shown to his satisfaction. As per section 107(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, Appellate Authority has powers to condone the delay beyond the period of 3 months or 6 months, upto a period of 1 month where sufficient cause for the delay is shown. The appellant/applicant must have sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making the application in time. As such, the appellate authority considers each such case on merits keeping in view sufficient cause. In various judicial pronouncements, it has been held that sufficient cause would depend upon facts and circumstances of each case and may include reasons such as death in family, long illness, loss of documents, non-receipt of order, improper guidance, change of consultant, shifting of office etc. GST Council Recommendation 52nd meeting of GST Council held on 07.10.2023 recommended an Amnesty Scheme. Accordingly, the Council recommended providing an amnesty scheme through a special procedure under section 148 of CGST Act, 2017 for taxable persons, who could not file an appeal under section 107 of the said Act, against the demand order under section 73 or 74 of CGST Act, 2017 passed on or before the 31st day of March, 2023, or whose appeal against the said order was rejected solely on the grounds that the said appeal was not filed within the time period specified in sub-section (1) of section 107. In all such cases, filing of appeal by the taxpayers will be allowed against such orders upto 31 January 2024, subject to the condition of payment of an amount of pre-deposit of 12.5% of the tax under dispute, out of which at least 20% (i.e. 2.5% of the tax under dispute) should be debited from Electronic Cash Ledger. This will facilitate a large number of taxpayers, who could not file appeal in the past within the specified time period. Amnesty Scheme for GST Appeals CBIC has notified an ‘Amnesty Scheme’ for belated filing of appeals under section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, as recommended by GST Council in its 52nd meeting held on 07.10.2023, vide Notification No. 53/2023-Central Tax dated 02.11.2023
(a) in full, such part of the amount of tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from the impugned order, as is admitted by him; and (b) a sum equal to twelve and a half per cent. of the remaining amount of tax in dispute arising from the said order, subject to a maximum of twenty-five crore rupees, in relation to which the appeal has been filed, out of which at least twenty percent should have been paid by debiting from the Electronic Cash Ledger.
By: Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal - November 7, 2023
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||