Article Section | |||||||||||
Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN Experts This |
|||||||||||
DEEMED REGISTRATION UNDER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
DEEMED REGISTRATION UNDER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Registration Section 22 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (‘Act’ for short) provides for registration by every supplier under the Act. This section provides the threshold amount of taxable supply for the purpose of registration. Section 23 provides the list of persons who are not liable for registration under the Act. Section 24 provides the list of category of persons who are compulsorily required to be registered under the Act. Procedure for registration Section 25 of the Act provides the procedure for registration under the Act by the supplier who is liable to be registered under the Act. The procedure of registration is as discussed below-
Deemed Registration Section 26 provides that the grant of registration or the Unique Identity Number under the State Act or the Union Territory GST Act shall be deemed to be a grant of registration or the Unique Identity Number under this Act subject to the condition that the application for registration or the Unique Identity Number has not been rejected under this Act within the time specified 25 (1). If the proper officer fails to take any action, -
the application for grant of registration shall be deemed to have been approved. In ‘West Bengal Lottery Stockists Syndicate Private Limited v. Union of India’ – 2019 (5) TMI 1396 - KERALA HIGH COURT the petitioner applied for registration under the Act and KGST Act. The petitioner uploaded the application on 16.01.2019. The petitioner received a notice on 31.01.2019 seeking additional information for registration stating the following reasons-
The petitioner was directed to submit their reply by 08.02.2019. The Registering Authority issued an order rejecting the petitioner’s application stating that reply has not been found satisfactory and also the application is not in accordance with the provisions of the Act. The petitioner challenged the said order in the High Court through this writ petition. The petitioner submitted the following before the High Court-
The Department submitted the following before the High Court-
The Department also produced the documentary evidence on technical snag. The High Court observed that the officer concerned must be very prompt in taking the action for registration. The outer limit of 3 days for the grant of registration is fixed to secure the above purpose. In this case there is an attempt on the part of the officer concerned to intimate the defects exist in the application and the same could not be communicated to the applicant on account of a technical snag. The deeming provision has to be interpreted strictly as it creates legal fiction. If the officer had taken steps within three days, the applicant cannot have an advantage of deeming provision even though the applicant had not received such communication. The deeming provision does not stipulate that deeming would arise if the communication is not received by the applicant within 3 days. There the High Court held that the petitioner cannot have an advantage of deeming registration. The High Court has set aside the reason enumerated by the Department in point no.2 of the notice. The petitioner will have to satisfy all other relevant materials like proving ownership of business through such documents which may be required and also such details which they may be required to be furnished under the Act. The High Court directed the Department to reconsider the case and fresh decision may be taken in accordance with the Act and rules on submitting the application by the petitioner. The High Court further held that the previous rejection of the application will not stand in the way of the petitioner in filing a fresh application.
By: Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN - July 19, 2019
Discussions to this article
Dear Sir, Your article has made the concept of 'deemed registration' clear to me. It is very useful information supported by the High Court. Thanks a lot.
Sri Mariappan Sir is having sea of knowledge. Like tide coming without getting tired, his article is also coming non stop.
Yes. Sh.Govindarajan Sir has unlimited stamina and talent. The special feature of his articles is that his articles are always unique.The title of article penned by him attracts the reader. Moreover, the readers get all the case laws on the same issue in a capsule form in one go. They get cooked up material. This saves their time, money and energy. Whenever I search any issue on Google, I get his article. He is so popular and humble also. In any article title should be attractive and unique. I have learned from his articles. This expression is based in factual position.
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||