GSTR1 Returns and its effect on the availment of input credit under the 20% Input credit rule

[CASeetharaman KC]

The present scheme of filing returns under the GST regime requires the tax payer to file GSTR-3B return which is a summary of the total despatches of goods or provision of services made during the month and the payment of tax calculated at the rates applicable to the goods or services supplied. There is a table under which the input tax credit amount can also be claimed based on the purchase invoices in the possession of the taxpayer provided the goods and or services have been received by him in that particular month.

The other return which the taxpayer files is the GSTR-1 return which contains the detailed list of invoices issued by him during the month with full details as to the GSTN no of the purchaser, the taxable value, GST amount and total invoice value. The above information needs to be fed for B2B invoices and as the scope of our discussions covers availment of Input tax credit we are referring to B2B invoices only. The B2B invoices get recorded into the GSTN system and get reflected in the GSTR-2A of the purchaser which contains the list of invoices which have been entered by various suppliers of the taxpayer in their respective GSTR-1’s. It is here that the Input tax credit which is available to the taxpayer as per the invoices entered by his sellers is reflected.

The present amendment made by notification no 49/2019 dated 9^th October 2019, by the insertion of sub rule (4) of Rule 36 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 has placed a cap of 20% (i.e. Credit reflected in GSTR-2A plus 20%) on the input credit which can be availed by a taxpayer on the input tax paid on goods purchased by him. The new rule says that the taxpayer can avail only 20% extra amount than the amount of input credit reflected in his GSTR-2A return.

If we analyse this further the following eventualities could happen:

1. A  Bonafide taxpayer (Purchaser)  correctly pays taxes on his purchases however the seller fails to upload the invoices in that particular month and probably uploads it in the next month
2. A  Bonafide taxpayer (Purchaser) correctly pays taxes on his purchases however the seller uploads the invoices mentioning incorrect GSTN no and the credit incorrectly gets reflected in the GSTR-2A of another taxpayer
3. A  Bonafide taxpayer (Purchaser) correctly pays taxes on his purchases however the seller does not upload any of the invoices and just ignores to do so
4. The Purchaser and the Seller collude with each other where the latter issues spurious invoices to the former on the basis of which he takes credit. None of these invoices are uploaded in the GSTR-1 of the Seller and are not reflected in the GSTR-2A of the Buyer as this is case of collusion and fraud

Now when we look at the examples given above it is clear that in the first three cases the purchaser or the taxpayer is a bonafide person who has purchased goods from a Supplier and paid GST on the goods in good faith and subsequently availed input credit based on the Invoice issued by the Supplier. Majority of the purchases fall in this category as most of the taxpayers who have been operating  their businesses over several years or maybe even generations and would belong to the law abiding category whereas the people who fall in the fourth category are seasoned fraudsters who want to make some quick money. The amendment made through Rule 36 (4) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 is aimed at the fourth category only.

It is really unfortunate that Notification 49/2019 dated 9^th October 2019 has come out with a sub-rule (4) in Rule 36 which penalises the bonafide majority to curb the frauds committed by some fraudsters who want to derail the system of availing credit by a Bonafide taxpayer. Subsequent to this notification It has now become the responsibility of the taxpayer (Purchaser) to ensure that his purchases are entered by his supplier correctly in the GSTR-1 filed by him so that the same gets reflected in his GSTR-2A.

This will definitely open the floodgates of litigation wherein the Bonafide purchaser would be forced to seek redressal in a court of law as to why he should be precluded from availing Input Tax Credit of the tax which he has genuinely paid and due to no fault on his part. There are several cases decided in the VAT era which clearly indicate that legislation of this nature which precludes the availment of Input Tax Credit due to no fault of a Bonafide purchaser would not stand.

Moreover there are more and enough provisions in the present GST law which entitle the Department to take appropriate action against such fraudulent transactions and availment of input credit against spurious invoices where collusion has happened.

The following suggestions are also made which could ensure that a Bonafide purchaser of goods gets the input tax credit which he is entitled to:

1. Create a data input mechanism within the existing GST return wherein a bonafide purchaser could enter the details of the purchases which he has made from various sellers with the invoice details, GSTN no of the supplier, taxable value of purchases and the amount of input claimed so that the same can be matched at the back end by the GSTN system with the sales details entered by the Supplier. Presently only the input tax credit figure which is being claimed by the taxpayer is required to be declared in the GSTR-3B.
2. Wherever there is a mismatch between the purchases data entered by a bonafide purchaser on the basis of which he has claimed input credit and the sales data declared by the supplier the mismatched invoices should be brought to the notice of the seller with appropriate demand for tax and interest charges on the amounts unpaid and sales under declared.
3. If the seller disagrees with the demand for tax as calculated on the above basis then he could be allowed to file his objections which would ultimately prove whether the details declared by the bonafide purchaser is genuine and backed by relevant invoices issued by the seller.
4. The above system if followed strictly would throw up all the Suppliers who are either raising spurious invoices or under declaring their sales figures. There may be genuine cases of mismatch which the seller would be able to explain and justify
5. The payment of tax by any taxpayer should be possible only after the filing of his GSTR-1 and not by GSTR-3B only. This would also ensure that all suppliers upload their sales invoices by the 20^th of the next month so that GSTR-2A of the purchaser gets populated with the input tax credits at the earliest.

The above provisions relating to the cap of 20% on availment of input tax credit notified as per Notification no 49/2019 dated 9^th October 2019 only adds salt to the wound as businesses which are already reeling under the present adverse economic conditions would have to look for additional working capital which otherwise the input credit of taxes paid was providing them with.

Discussions to this article

[Ganeshan Kalyani]

The hardship is going to come while reconciling the 2A report. Better way is to claim credit of those invoices which are matching. And follow up with the supplier to upload the invoices which he has missed to upload. This exercise is a preparatory step to become ready for the new format of return which is going to come from April 2020.

[CASeetharaman KC]

Agreed Sir! Reconciliation is going to be difficult.Moreover the problem here is that the purchaser would have to be following up with the seller constantly for getting his input credit. This is nothing but passing on the burden to the taxpayers who have to pay the tax and again also ensure that supplier uploads the sales invoices also.