2002 (9) TMI 486 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

The appeal for restoration was filed by M/s. Rathi Graphics Technology Ltd. as they did not comply with the deposit requirement stated in the Stay Order. The appellant deposited the required amount in three instalments with some delay. The appellant's counsel cited a case where the Tribunal restored appeals despite delays in deposit. However, the Tribunal rejected the restoration application due to a delay of one and a half years, deeming it unreasonable.