Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2003 (1) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2003 (1) TMI 20 - HC - Income TaxWhether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the income of the assessee-trust was not entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a)? - ssessee has incurred more expenses than the income - Considering the specific finding of the Tribunal and the Assessing Officer that the assessee has incurred expenses from the charity fund and has incurred excess expenses than the income earned, the assessee is not entitled for exemption under section 11(1)(a)
Issues:
Whether the income of the assessee-trust is entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. Analysis: The case involved a trust constituted by Shri Jeewanmal Tapadia for managing religious and charitable funds. The trust claimed exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. The Income-tax Officer observed that the trust had incurred more expenses than income during the accounting period. For instance, in the Shri Kaliji Temple, the income was Rs. 4,826, while expenses were Rs. 7,998, with the excess being met from accumulated funds. Similar situations were found in other funds managed by the trust. The Assessing Officer denied the exemption under section 11(1)(a) due to the excessive expenses compared to income. Upon appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner referred to a decision by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh and allowed the appeal. However, the Tribunal reversed this decision, noting that the trust had indeed incurred more expenses than income, making it ineligible for exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal concurred with the Assessing Officer's view. The High Court, considering the findings of the Tribunal and the Assessing Officer, upheld that the trust had spent more from the charity fund than the income generated, making it ineligible for exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The court disposed of the reference accordingly.
|