Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (4) TMI 660 - AT - Central Excise

The judgement from the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, Citation: 2009 (4) TMI 660 - CESTAT, New Delhi, was presided over by Shri Rakesh Kumar, J. The case involved an application for waiver of the pre-deposit of Cenvat credit demand amounting to Rs. 43,719, along with interest and an equal penalty, imposed on the appellant. The demand was upheld by the impugned order-in-appeal dated 27-8-08 passed by CCE (Appeals), Indore.

During the hearing, no one appeared for the Appellant. The learned Departmental Representative, Shri S.K. Bhaskar, reiterated the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order. He argued that the Cenvat credit of Rs. 43,719 had been taken by the appellant in relation to Sulphuric Acid used in the effluent treatment plant, which was deemed unrelated to the manufacturing activity. Consequently, the appellant was deemed ineligible for the Cenvat credit, and the demand was rightfully upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Departmental Representative contended that this case did not warrant a waiver for pre-deposit.

Upon careful consideration of the submissions and perusal of the records, the issue at hand was determined to be whether the appellant was eligible for Cenvat credit on duty paid for Sulphuric Acid used in the Effluent Treatment Plant, which formed part of their refining of edible oil and manufacturing of Vanaspati. The presiding judge noted that the Effluent Treatment Plant was an integral part of the manufacturing activity, as untreated effluents could not be discharged directly. Based on this observation, the judge found a prima facie case in favor of the appellant. Consequently, the pre-deposit of the Cenvat credit demand and penalty was waived for the hearing of the appeal, and recovery was stayed pending the appeal's disposal.

The judgement was dictated and pronounced in an open court setting.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates