Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1992 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1992 (2) TMI 51 - HC - Income Tax

  1. 2022 (8) TMI 588 - HC
  2. 2018 (9) TMI 78 - HC
  3. 2018 (8) TMI 196 - HC
  4. 2017 (11) TMI 391 - HC
  5. 2017 (11) TMI 1421 - HC
  6. 2017 (8) TMI 931 - HC
  7. 2017 (3) TMI 896 - HC
  8. 2016 (11) TMI 1313 - HC
  9. 2016 (7) TMI 1046 - HC
  10. 2016 (7) TMI 710 - HC
  11. 2016 (6) TMI 1181 - HC
  12. 2016 (3) TMI 462 - HC
  13. 2014 (12) TMI 145 - HC
  14. 2014 (11) TMI 733 - HC
  15. 2015 (8) TMI 89 - HC
  16. 2012 (4) TMI 289 - HC
  17. 2012 (4) TMI 115 - HC
  18. 2011 (10) TMI 694 - HC
  19. 2011 (9) TMI 1064 - HC
  20. 2014 (2) TMI 789 - HC
  21. 2010 (7) TMI 377 - HC
  22. 2010 (7) TMI 573 - HC
  23. 2010 (7) TMI 374 - HC
  24. 2010 (1) TMI 1151 - HC
  25. 2009 (5) TMI 41 - HC
  26. 2005 (7) TMI 75 - HC
  27. 1999 (7) TMI 50 - HC
  28. 1993 (11) TMI 17 - HC
  29. 2022 (12) TMI 397 - AT
  30. 2022 (6) TMI 1385 - AT
  31. 2022 (5) TMI 192 - AT
  32. 2022 (5) TMI 48 - AT
  33. 2021 (3) TMI 1003 - AT
  34. 2021 (3) TMI 225 - AT
  35. 2021 (1) TMI 913 - AT
  36. 2020 (12) TMI 411 - AT
  37. 2019 (12) TMI 1256 - AT
  38. 2019 (12) TMI 485 - AT
  39. 2019 (11) TMI 924 - AT
  40. 2019 (9) TMI 909 - AT
  41. 2019 (11) TMI 1222 - AT
  42. 2019 (9) TMI 661 - AT
  43. 2019 (4) TMI 553 - AT
  44. 2019 (3) TMI 386 - AT
  45. 2019 (3) TMI 216 - AT
  46. 2019 (2) TMI 1133 - AT
  47. 2019 (1) TMI 1451 - AT
  48. 2018 (9) TMI 1693 - AT
  49. 2018 (7) TMI 1082 - AT
  50. 2018 (6) TMI 1827 - AT
  51. 2018 (6) TMI 226 - AT
  52. 2018 (5) TMI 2094 - AT
  53. 2018 (3) TMI 73 - AT
  54. 2018 (2) TMI 1593 - AT
  55. 2018 (4) TMI 77 - AT
  56. 2017 (12) TMI 802 - AT
  57. 2017 (9) TMI 1031 - AT
  58. 2017 (9) TMI 1030 - AT
  59. 2017 (9) TMI 965 - AT
  60. 2017 (4) TMI 1289 - AT
  61. 2017 (2) TMI 781 - AT
  62. 2017 (1) TMI 666 - AT
  63. 2016 (12) TMI 687 - AT
  64. 2016 (12) TMI 345 - AT
  65. 2016 (10) TMI 1287 - AT
  66. 2016 (10) TMI 493 - AT
  67. 2016 (9) TMI 1584 - AT
  68. 2016 (8) TMI 1405 - AT
  69. 2016 (8) TMI 54 - AT
  70. 2016 (6) TMI 256 - AT
  71. 2016 (6) TMI 792 - AT
  72. 2016 (5) TMI 1131 - AT
  73. 2016 (5) TMI 165 - AT
  74. 2016 (3) TMI 546 - AT
  75. 2016 (3) TMI 545 - AT
  76. 2015 (8) TMI 221 - AT
  77. 2015 (12) TMI 1365 - AT
  78. 2015 (3) TMI 1289 - AT
  79. 2015 (10) TMI 176 - AT
  80. 2014 (7) TMI 682 - AT
  81. 2014 (5) TMI 891 - AT
  82. 2014 (7) TMI 626 - AT
  83. 2014 (1) TMI 1632 - AT
  84. 2013 (12) TMI 1716 - AT
  85. 2013 (11) TMI 1781 - AT
  86. 2013 (11) TMI 1778 - AT
  87. 2013 (12) TMI 889 - AT
  88. 2014 (1) TMI 1269 - AT
  89. 2013 (6) TMI 903 - AT
  90. 2013 (2) TMI 773 - AT
  91. 2013 (2) TMI 910 - AT
  92. 2013 (2) TMI 755 - AT
  93. 2015 (1) TMI 310 - AT
  94. 2013 (1) TMI 846 - AT
  95. 2013 (1) TMI 1025 - AT
  96. 2012 (10) TMI 1078 - AT
  97. 2012 (9) TMI 954 - AT
  98. 2013 (12) TMI 163 - AT
  99. 2012 (9) TMI 370 - AT
  100. 2012 (8) TMI 990 - AT
  101. 2012 (10) TMI 57 - AT
  102. 2012 (10) TMI 752 - AT
  103. 2012 (10) TMI 430 - AT
  104. 2012 (7) TMI 252 - AT
  105. 2012 (9) TMI 180 - AT
  106. 2012 (9) TMI 179 - AT
  107. 2012 (8) TMI 355 - AT
  108. 2012 (7) TMI 126 - AT
  109. 2012 (5) TMI 663 - AT
  110. 2012 (5) TMI 79 - AT
  111. 2012 (4) TMI 744 - AT
  112. 2012 (4) TMI 605 - AT
  113. 2012 (3) TMI 489 - AT
  114. 2012 (10) TMI 80 - AT
  115. 2011 (12) TMI 598 - AT
  116. 2011 (12) TMI 562 - AT
  117. 2012 (8) TMI 254 - AT
  118. 2011 (2) TMI 1408 - AT
  119. 2011 (2) TMI 1401 - AT
  120. 2010 (11) TMI 990 - AT
  121. 2010 (11) TMI 975 - AT
  122. 2010 (10) TMI 667 - AT
  123. 2010 (7) TMI 1092 - AT
  124. 2010 (2) TMI 1156 - AT
  125. 2010 (1) TMI 807 - AT
  126. 2009 (7) TMI 1263 - AT
  127. 2008 (7) TMI 623 - AT
  128. 2008 (6) TMI 590 - AT
  129. 2008 (4) TMI 747 - AT
  130. 2008 (4) TMI 333 - AT
  131. 2006 (6) TMI 153 - AT
  132. 2006 (3) TMI 239 - AT
  133. 2006 (3) TMI 191 - AT
Issues involved: Interpretation of provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding computation of income for a trust and whether depreciation should be allowed while calculating income under section 11(1)(a).

Summary:
The High Court of Gujarat addressed the questions referred by the Tribunal under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The case involved a trust registered under the Public Trusts Act, deriving income mainly from immovable property. The dispute arose when the Income-tax Officer rejected the claim of depreciation made by the assessee, contending that income from house property should be calculated according to specific provisions of sections 22 to 27 of the Act. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner disagreed, leading to an appeal to the Tribunal, which ultimately dismissed the appeal. The Revenue then sought clarification on two key questions related to the computation of income under section 11(1)(a) of the Act.

The main argument put forth by the Revenue was that the Tribunal erred in not following the specific provisions of sections 22 to 27 for computing income, instead of relying on normal accounting rules that allow for depreciation. The Court referenced precedents from other High Courts, such as the Karnataka High Court and the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which emphasized the importance of allowing depreciation to determine the true income available for charitable purposes. Similarly, the Madras High Court highlighted that income should be understood in a general sense, not limited by artificial provisions for tax assessment purposes.

In alignment with the interpretations of the Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, and Madras High Courts, the High Court of Gujarat ruled in favor of allowing depreciation while computing income for charitable institutions under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Both questions referred by the Tribunal were answered in the affirmative, against the Revenue. No costs were awarded in this judgment.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates