Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2014 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (3) TMI 560 - AT - Customs


Issues involved:
Refund claim of SAD denial under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Refund claim of SAD denial under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus.

The appellant imported capital goods under the EPCG scheme, initially cleared at a concessional duty rate. After opting out of the scheme, the Bills of Entry were reassessed, and 4% SAD was paid by the appellant. Upon clearance of goods, a refund claim for SAD under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus. was filed but rejected by the adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals). The appellant contended that since they paid SAD and VAT, they were entitled to a refund as per the notification. The Revenue argued that the benefit applies to subsequent sale of imported goods with duty paid at importation, which was not the case here. The Tribunal found that SAD is payable on imported goods to counterbalance VAT/sales tax, and the appellant did not meet the conditions of Notification No. 102/2007 as the goods were used, not imported for subsequent sale. The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim based on these findings and relevant legal provisions.

Key Points:
- SAD payable on imported goods to offset VAT/sales tax.
- Conditions of Notification No. 102/2007 not met as goods were used, not imported for subsequent sale.
- Tribunal upheld rejection of refund claim based on legal provisions and factual analysis.

Significant Phrases:
- Notification No. 102/2007-Cus.
- EPCG scheme
- SAD @ 4%
- Customs Tariff Act, 1975
- Refund claim rejection
- Tribunal's analysis and decision

This detailed analysis covers the issues involved in the legal judgment, providing a comprehensive understanding of the case and the Tribunal's decision regarding the refund claim denial under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates