Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2015 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (2) TMI 541 - HC - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to claim deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act.
2. Treatment of losses and deductions set off against income of previous years.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Entitlement to Claim Deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act:

The core issue raised in this Tax Case (Appeal) is whether the respondent/assessee is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act. The learned counsel for the assessee argued that this issue has already been decided by the High Court of Madras in the case of Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills V. Asst. CIT (2012) 340 ITR 477, which should be followed in the present case. The High Court, in that decision, placed reliance on the Supreme Court's judgment in Liberty India V. CIT (2009) 317 ITR 218 (SC), which considered the scope of Sections 80I, 80IA, and 80IB of the Income Tax Act. The Supreme Court held that Chapter VI-A provides profit-linked incentives in the form of tax deductions. The High Court concluded that once losses and other deductions have been set off against the income of the previous year, they should not be reopened for computing current year income under Section 80I or 80IA, and the assessee should not be denied the admissible deduction under Section 80IA.

2. Treatment of Losses and Deductions Set Off Against Income of Previous Years:

The High Court reiterated that the provisions of Section 80-IA, introduced by the Finance Act, 1999, are similar to those of Section 80-I. Both sections are part of Chapter VI-A, which deals with deductions in computing total income. The relevant provisions for consideration are Sections 80-I, 80-IA, and 80-IB. The Supreme Court, in Liberty India V. CIT, emphasized that Sections 80-IA/80-IB are self-contained codes with both substantive and procedural provisions. Subsection (5) of Section 80-IA specifies that profits of an eligible business should be computed as if such business were the only source of income of the assessee. This means that once losses are set off against other income in earlier years, they cannot be notionally brought forward for the purpose of computing deductions under Section 80-IA.

The High Court noted that in the present case, the assessee's losses had already been set off against profits of earlier years. During the relevant assessment year, the assessee exercised the option under Section 80-IA(2), and there were no unabsorbed depreciation or losses of the eligible undertakings. The High Court agreed with the Division Bench judgment in the unreported case and the Rajasthan High Court's decision in CIT v. Mewar Oil and General Mills Ltd. (No. 1) (2004) 271 ITR 311 (Raj), which held that it is not required to reopen losses or deductions already set off against previous years' income for computing current income under Section 80-I.

The High Court concluded that the Revenue cannot rework set-off amounts notionally once they have been absorbed in earlier years. The fiction created by Section 80-IA(5) is limited to determining the quantum of deduction and does not extend to bringing forward set-off amounts notionally. The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, confirming the order passed by the Tribunal and holding that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under Section 80-IA.

Conclusion:

The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal and confirmed the Tribunal's order, holding that the assessee is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act. The Court reiterated that losses and deductions set off against income of previous years cannot be reopened for computing current year income under Section 80-IA. The questions of law raised in the appeal were answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates