Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2015 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (3) TMI 265 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act.
2. Addition of Rs. 40,71,516/- to the income of the assessee.
3. Treatment of subsidy received from the Central Government.
4. Rejection of exemption under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act:
The assessee incurred advertisement expenses totaling Rs. 16,06,040/- without deducting tax at source as required under Section 194C. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the expenses under Section 40(a)(ia), which was upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee argued that the entire amount was paid during the year and relied on the Allahabad High Court decision in Vector Shipping Pvt. Ltd., which held that disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) applies only to amounts payable at the year-end. However, the Tribunal referred to the decisions of the Gujarat and Calcutta High Courts, which held that Section 40(a)(ia) applies to all amounts payable during the year, not just those outstanding at year-end. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance, dismissing the assessee's appeal.

2. Addition of Rs. 40,71,516/- to the income of the assessee:
The AO added Rs. 40,71,516/- to the income, representing contributions from primary cooperative societies to the Process, Project, and Research Fund. The CIT(A) upheld the addition, stating that the contributions constituted income as the repayment to societies was discretionary. The assessee argued that the amount was collected for purchasing milk testing and milking machines and was not income. The Tribunal found that the collections were identified and credited to the respective societies, and the purpose was to purchase machines for the societies. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the collections did not constitute income and directed the AO to delete the addition.

3. Treatment of subsidy received from the Central Government:
The assessee received a grant of Rs. 1.35 crores from the Central Government under a scheme for strengthening infrastructure for quality and clean milk production. The AO reduced the subsidy from the cost of bulk coolers and disallowed excess depreciation of Rs. 10,12,500/-. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision. The assessee argued that the subsidy was a capital receipt and not specifically for the cost of bulk coolers. The Tribunal found that the subsidy was not for a specific asset but for overall infrastructure development. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow depreciation on the full cost of the bulk coolers without reducing the subsidy.

4. Rejection of exemption under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act:
The assessee claimed exemption under Section 80P(2)(d) on interest income of Rs. 56,37,310/- from investments in cooperative banks. The AO allowed the exemption on the net interest income after deducting interest expenditure of Rs. 8,24,156/-. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision. The assessee argued that the exemption should be on the gross interest income. The Tribunal referred to the Punjab & Haryana High Court decision in Daoba Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd., which allowed exemption on gross interest income. Accordingly, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow the exemption on the gross interest income.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia), allowed the appeal on the addition of Rs. 40,71,516/- and the treatment of subsidy, and directed the AO to allow exemption under Section 80P(2)(d) on the gross interest income. The appeal was partly allowed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates