Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + SC Customs - 2015 (8) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (8) TMI 289 - SC - Customs


Issues involved:
Penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Penalty Imposition: The only issue in the appeals was related to the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, amounting to &8377; 2,11,20,918. The Tribunal upheld the duty and penalty, stating that the goods were cleared by the respondent under Notification No. 13/81-Cus. without adhering to the conditions, specifically using the system in a premises other than 100% EOU. The Tribunal also maintained the redemption fine of &8377; 25 lakhs. However, the Tribunal reduced the penalty to &8377; 50 lakhs, citing that the maximum penalty was not warranted due to the contravention occurring after a specific date.

2. Tribunal's Justification: The Tribunal justified the reduction in penalty by pointing out that the contravention of the Notification's condition occurred only after a certain date. The Tribunal considered this fact in determining that the maximum penalty was not justified based on the provisions of Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. However, the Supreme Court found that reducing the penalty to less than 25% was unwarranted considering the conditions of Notification No. 13/81-Cus. The Court decided to enhance the penalty to 50% of the duty amount.

3. Court's Decision: After considering the arguments and the provisions of the Customs Act, the Supreme Court partly allowed the appeals. The Court modified the penalty imposed by enhancing it to 50% of the duty amount, disagreeing with the Tribunal's decision to reduce the penalty to less than 25%. The rest of the Tribunal's order was upheld, maintaining the duty, confiscation order, and redemption fine.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates