2015 (10) TMI 166 - AT - Income Tax

Disallowance of commission amount paid to foreign agents u/s 40(a)(i) - non deduction of tax at source - Held that - . We notice that the assessing officer or Ld CIT(A) has not brought any material on record to substantiate their views that some other kind of services were also rendered by the foreign agents. Hence, we have to agree with the submission of the assessee that the commission amounts were paid for procuring sales orders. Hence, by following the decision rendered by the Hon ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT V/s Faizan Shoes Pvt Ltd 2014 (8) TMI 170 - MADRAS HIGH COURT and Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Dy. CIT v Angelique International Ltd. (2013 (10) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT) we hold that the payment made for technical services will not fall in the category of Fee for Technical Services as defined u/s 9(1)(vii) of the Act. Accordingly, we hold that the Assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source from the commission payments made to the foreign agents in the facts and circumstances of the instant case. Accordingly, we set aside the order of ld. CIT(A) and direct the AO to delete the impugned disallowance. - Decided in favour of assessee.

Issues:
- Disallowance of commission amount paid to foreign agents without deduction of tax at source
- Applicability of "Fee for technical services" under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act
- Retrospective effect of amendments in the Act
- Validity of circulars issued by CBDT regarding tax liability on commission payments to foreign agents
- Legality of rectification order passed by the AO without giving opportunity of being heard

Analysis:

Issue 1: Disallowance of commission amount paid to foreign agents without deduction of tax at source

The Assessee challenged the disallowance of commission amount paid to foreign agents without tax deduction. The AO disallowed the commission expenditure under section 40(a)(i) of the Act for non-deduction of tax at source. The ld. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, considering the services provided by foreign agents as taxable in India. However, the ITAT held that the payment made for securing sales orders does not fall under "Fee for Technical Services" as defined in section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. The ITAT relied on decisions by the Hon'ble Madras High Court and the Delhi Tribunal to support this view. It was concluded that the commission amounts were paid for procuring sales orders, not technical services, and hence the disallowance was not justified.

Issue 2: Applicability of "Fee for technical services" under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act

The ITAT examined whether the services rendered by foreign commission agents fell under "Fee for Technical Services" as defined in section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. The Assessee argued that the services were for securing sales orders and not technical services. The ITAT agreed with the Assessee, citing relevant court decisions, and held that the payment made for technical services did not fall under the category of "Fee for Technical Services" as defined in the Act.

Issue 3: Retrospective effect of amendments in the Act

The Assessee contended that the retrospective amendment in the Act, requiring tax deduction at source for technical services, should not apply to commission payments made before the insertion of the Explanation below section 9(2). The ITAT supported this argument based on previous tribunal decisions. It was held that the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could not be made for past actions based on subsequent amendments with retrospective effect.

Issue 4: Validity of circulars issued by CBDT regarding tax liability on commission payments to foreign agents

The Assessee relied on old circulars issued by CBDT stating that commission payments made to foreign agents for services outside India were not taxable in India. Although these circulars were later withdrawn, the Assessee argued that they should apply to the commission payments made during their validity. The ITAT agreed with the Assessee, holding that the Assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source based on the old circulars.

Issue 5: Legality of rectification order passed by the AO without giving opportunity of being heard

The Assessee raised concerns about the legality of the rectification order passed by the AO without providing an opportunity to be heard. However, since the ITAT had already decided to delete the addition made in the rectification order on merits, it did not address this procedural issue separately.

In conclusion, the ITAT allowed both appeals filed by the Assessee, directing the AO to delete the disallowance of commission payments to foreign agents without tax deduction and the addition made in the rectification order. The judgment was pronounced on 8th October 2014.

← Previous Next →