Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2015 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (10) TMI 2198 - AT - Central Excise


Issues involved:
1. Denial of cenvat credit on service tax prior to the start of production.
2. Invocation of extended period of limitation for imposing penalty.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The appellant appealed against the order denying cenvat credit on the basis that the ISD distributed the credit before the start of production, which was then utilized for duty payment. The appellant argued that Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 allows for credit utilization before manufacturing begins, with Rule 7 governing ISD credit distribution. The appellant cited relevant case laws to support their claim. The issue of extended limitation period was raised due to a show cause notice issued later. The adjudicating authority did not impose a penalty, but the Commissioner (Appeals) disagreed. The appellant contended that the extended period was not applicable.

2. The respondent opposed the appellant's claim, arguing that taking cenvat credit before production starts is not permissible. They emphasized that the department learned of this during an audit, justifying the extended limitation period. The respondent disputed the relevance of the case laws cited by the appellant. The tribunal analyzed Rule 7, which limits credit distribution and Rule 3, allowing manufacturers to claim credit. It was concluded that there is no restriction on procuring credit before production. The tribunal found no merit in the respondent's arguments and upheld the appellant's right to the credit. Regarding the limitation issue, it was determined that the appellant did not act with fraudulent intent or suppression, thus the extended period was not applicable. The tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with any necessary relief.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates