Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2018 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (4) TMI 1734 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Validity of assessment proceedings under Section 143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Jurisdiction of the Assessment Officer regarding the non-issuance of notice under Section 143 (2) of the Act.

Validity of Assessment Proceedings under Section 143 (3):
The appeal was directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, where the assessee, an individual engaged in brokerage business, had undergone a search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessment was completed under Section 143 (3) read with Section 153 (D) of the Act, resulting in additions on various accounts, including unexplained cash, jewelry, hundies, and cash receipts. The Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal) partially deleted certain additions, which led to further appeals by both the Revenue and the Assessee.

Jurisdiction Issue and Non-issuance of Notice under Section 143 (2):
The Tribunal upheld the cross-objection filed by the Assessee, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to the absence of a notice under Section 143 (2) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory requirement of issuing such notice and concluded that the Assessment Officer lacked jurisdiction in the absence of the said notice. The Tribunal referred to the case law and highlighted that the defect of non-issuance of notice under Section 143 (2) is not curable, even under section 292 BB of the Act. The Tribunal further noted that the assessment order was passed without the required notice, rendering the entire assessment proceedings invalid in law.

Legal Precedent and Conclusion:
The Tribunal's decision was supported by legal precedents, including the case of Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. Vs. M/s Hotel Blue Moon, where the Supreme Court held that the issuance of notice under Section 143 (2) is mandatory and not a procedural irregularity. Consequently, the Tribunal's decision to quash the assessment order due to the lack of jurisdiction was upheld. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that no substantial question of law arose for consideration in light of the established legal principles.

This judgment highlights the critical importance of adhering to procedural requirements, such as issuing notices under relevant sections of the Income Tax Act, to maintain the validity of assessment proceedings and ensure the jurisdiction of the Assessment Officer. The decision underscores the significance of statutory compliance in tax assessments and the implications of non-compliance on the legality of the assessment process.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates