9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (8) TMI 237 - AT - Income TaxInterest on refunds u/s 244A - unpaid portion representing tax as well as interest - Held that - The assessee is entitled for interest on unpaid interest and accordingly dismiss the grounds raised by the revenue in this regard. See Union Bank of India v. Asst. CIT 2016 (8) TMI 688 - ITAT MUMBAI As decided in the assessee's own case for the very same assessment year 2002-03 had upheld the order of the learned Assessing Officer granting interest under section 244A of the Act. The subsequent rectification proceedings and the consequent appellate orders thereon have been reversed by the hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the assessee's own case. Hence the Revenue should not have any grievance in the impugned appeal before us as the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had addressed the entire issue in the same lines in which the hon'ble High Court had addressed the issue. In our considered opinion, if at all the Revenue is aggrieved against the order of the hon'ble Calcutta High Court 2015 (7) TMI 780 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT , they should have preferred a special leave petition before the hon'ble Supreme Court. We feel that the Revenue should not be aggrieved by preferring an appeal before us against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) dated September 30, 2008. Hence the Revenue's appeal deserve to be dismissed on that count also.
Issues Involved:
1. Interest on refunds under section 244A of the Income-tax Act. 2. Exclusion of provisions for diminution in value of investments and non-performing assets while computing book profits under section 115JB. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Interest on Refunds under Section 244A: The primary issue was whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to grant interest on refunds under section 244A of the Income-tax Act on the unpaid portion representing tax as well as interest. The facts reveal that the Assessing Officer initially did not grant any interest under section 244A in the refund order. Subsequent orders adjusted the refund with outstanding demands and granted partial interest under section 244A. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) directed the Assessing Officer to grant interest on the unpaid interest, treating it as an amount due to the assessee. The Tribunal referenced several precedents, including the Supreme Court's decisions in Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. CIT and CIT v. H. E. G. Ltd., which supported the view that interest on unpaid interest is applicable under section 244A. The Tribunal concluded that the unpaid interest partakes the character of the principal amount due and hence, is entitled to interest under section 244A. The Tribunal also noted that the Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals case clarified that the assessee is entitled only to the interest provided under the statute, not additional interest on such statutory interest. However, it held that the assessee is entitled to interest on the unpaid interest, as supported by the Delhi High Court's decision in India Trade Promotion Organisation v. CIT. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this issue, affirming that the assessee is entitled to interest on unpaid interest. 2. Exclusion of Provisions for Diminution in Value of Investments and Non-performing Assets under Section 115JB: The second issue was whether the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was justified in directing the Assessing Officer to exclude the provision for diminution in the value of investments and the provision for non-performing assets while computing the book profits under section 115JB of the Act. During the hearing, the assessee's representative admitted that a writ petition challenging the retrospective amendment to section 115JB was dismissed by the Calcutta High Court. Consequently, the Tribunal agreed with the Assessing Officer's decision to include these provisions in the book profits computation under section 115JB. Conclusion: The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)'s decision on granting interest on unpaid interest under section 244A, dismissing the Revenue's grounds on this issue. However, it allowed the Revenue's grounds regarding the inclusion of provisions for diminution in value of investments and non-performing assets in the book profits computation under section 115JB, following the Calcutta High Court's dismissal of the writ petition challenging the retrospective amendment.
|
