Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2017 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (9) TMI 163 - AT - Service Tax


Issues Involved:
Whether services of harvesting and transportation of sugarcane and consideration received as "Sanugraha Anudan" are taxable under Business Auxiliary Service and if exemption Notification No.14/2004-ST dated 10/09/2004 applies.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Taxability of Services
The appellant argued that the services provided are exempted under Notification No.13/2003-ST dated 20/06/2003. They also contended that the services are exempted under Notification No.14/2004-ST dated 10/09/2004. The Tribunal noted that in a previous case involving the same service, the demand was set aside, indicating a favorable precedent. The Tribunal referenced the definitions in the notifications to determine that services related to agricultural produce, without altering its essential characteristics, are exempt from service tax.

Issue 2: Exemption Notifications
Notification No.13/2003-ST dated 20/06/2003 exempts commission agents in relation to the sale or purchase of agricultural produce from service tax. The Tribunal found that the services of harvesting and transporting sugarcane, being an agricultural produce, fell within the scope of this exemption. Additionally, Notification No.14/2004-ST dated 10/09/2004 provides an exemption for Business Auxiliary Services related to agricultural produce, including procurement, production, and provision of services incidental to specified activities.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the services provided by the appellant, involving harvesting and transportation of sugarcane for supply to a sugar factory, were exempted under the relevant notifications. Therefore, the impugned order confirming the demand, interest, and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed on 28/08/2017.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates