9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (9) TMI 1547 - AT - Central ExciseClassification of by-product - char-dolachar - whether that impugned by-product char-dolachar, emerging during manufacture of sponge iron will merit classification under CETH 26190090 as maintained by the department or under CETH 27012090 as held by the lower appellate authority? - Rule 3(a) of the General Rues of Interpretation to the First Schedule of the CETA, 1985 - Held that - There is no dispute that the impugned by-product is emerging during the manufacture of sponge iron. Hence, applying Rule 3(a) of the General Rules of Interpretation CETH 26190090 is the sub-heading which provides the most specific description for the impugned goods and hence that will have to be adopted. This being so, the application of Rule 3(b) of the rules and the reasoning of essential character of coal fines by the lower appellate authority is misconceived and cannot sustain - appeal allowed - decided in favor of Revenue.
Issues Involved:
Classification of by-product char-dolachar under Central Excise Tariff Heading (CETH) No. 27012090 or sub-heading no. 26190090. Detailed Analysis: 1. Facts and Background: The case involved M/s Reactive Metals of India Pvt Ltd., manufacturers of sponge iron, where char-dolachar emerged as a by-product during the manufacturing process. The dispute arose regarding the classification of this by-product under CETH No. 27012090 or sub-heading no. 26190090. The department issued show cause notices proposing demand of differential duty, interest, and penalties. The original authority confirmed the duty liability but refrained from imposing penalties due to the interpretation of law. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeals filed by the Respondent, relying on Rule 3(b) of General Rules for Interpretation and the essential character of coal fines in the by-product. 2. Appellant's Arguments: The appellant argued that the impugned goods emerged during the manufacture of sponge iron and should be classified under sub-heading no. 26190090. The appellant contended that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in relying on Rule 3(b) of the General Rules for Interpretation, as Rule 3(a) should be applied first for classification. The appellant requested setting aside the Commissioner's orders. 3. Respondent's Arguments: The respondent argued that the impugned item was predominantly coal by weight and should be classified under CETH No. 27012090 as unburnt coal left after the manufacturing process. The respondent emphasized that even though there were trace elements present, the item's essential character was coal. 4. Judgment and Analysis: The Tribunal analyzed the Central Excise Tariff rules, specifically Rule 3(a) and Rule 3(b, to determine the classification of the by-product char-dolachar. It was established that the by-product emerged during the manufacture of sponge iron, falling under the category covered by CETH 26190090 for waste from the manufacture of iron or steel. The Tribunal found that the lower appellate authority's reasoning on the essential character of coal fines was misconceived. Therefore, the impugned orders were set aside, and the original authority's decisions were restored. The Tribunal concluded that the by-product could not be classified as a fuel manufactured from coal and upheld the classification under CETH 26190090. 5. Conclusion: The Revenue appeals were allowed, and the orders of the original authority were restored. The Tribunal's decision clarified the correct classification of the by-product char-dolachar under the Central Excise Tariff, emphasizing the specific description provided by CETH 26190090 for waste from the manufacture of iron or steel, rather than as a fuel manufactured from coal under CETH 27012090.
|
