Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2017 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (10) TMI 173 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Refund of compensation and rent, Disputed demand of ?20,59,964, Failure to provide evidence of tax payment, Orders of Assessing Officer and CIT(A), High Court directions, Need for further inquiry by CIT(A).

Analysis:
1. The appellants sought refund of compensation and rent from the Land Acquisition Department and Tenant, challenging the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) decisions for not granting the refund due to lack of evidence and technical issues.
2. The Assessing Officer concluded that the record for the assessee was unavailable, no evidence of tax payment was provided, and there was a technical problem in issuing the refund without a specific assessment year.
3. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision, directing examination of the disputed demand of ?20,59,964, leading to the present appeal before the Tribunal.
4. The Tribunal reviewed the orders and found that the rental and compensation were attached against the demand, but discrepancies existed regarding the adjustment of these amounts.
5. The High Court directed the CIT(A) to treat the writ petitions as refund applications, reconstruct records if necessary, and conduct a thorough inquiry to resolve the matter.
6. The CIT(A) exceeded the issue's scope by considering irrelevant details, while the primary concern was the validity of attaching rental and compensation against the demand.
7. It was emphasized that a discreet inquiry was needed to determine if the attached amounts were adjusted against the demand, as the Revenue Department failed to clarify this crucial aspect.
8. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order, remitting the case for a fresh decision after a comprehensive inquiry to address the long-standing issue since 1986, ensuring a fair resolution for the assessee.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key legal aspects and procedural steps taken in the case, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation to resolve the refund dispute effectively.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates