Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2018 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (1) TMI 654 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Treatment of an amount as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Whether repayments, dividend distribution tax, and commercial transactions affect the applicability of Section 2(22)(e).
3. Determination of accumulated profits for the purpose of deemed dividend.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Treatment of an Amount as Deemed Dividend under Section 2(22)(e)
The primary issue in the appeal was whether the amount of ?1,59,04,178/- received by the assessee from M/s. Classic Linens International Pvt. Ltd. should be treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) determined that the conditions for treating the loan as deemed dividend were satisfied, as the company was one in which the public were not substantially interested, the loan was given to a registered shareholder holding more than 10% of equity shares, and the company possessed accumulated profits at the time of the loan. The AO, therefore, added the amount as deemed dividend in the hands of the assessee.

Issue 2: Repayments, Dividend Distribution Tax, and Commercial Transactions
The assessee contended that repayments made during the year, the dividend distribution tax paid, and the commercial nature of the transactions should be considered. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] observed that repayments do not affect the deeming provisions of Section 2(22)(e), citing the Supreme Court decision in Tarulata Shyam vs. CIT. The argument regarding the dividend distribution tax was also rejected, as the tax was introduced only from 01.05.1997 and does not affect the applicability of Section 2(22)(e). The CIT(A) also rejected the claim that the transactions were for commercial purposes, noting that the assessee failed to prove any commercial expediency for the advances.

Issue 3: Determination of Accumulated Profits
The assessee argued that the accumulated profits should be calculated up to 31.03.2006 and not include current year's profits. The Tribunal held that accumulated profits for the purpose of Section 2(22)(e) do not include current year's business profits, as they accrue only at the end of the year. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify each debit entry and compute the deemed dividend based on the day-to-day debit balance and accumulated profits. The Tribunal also noted that any dividend declared and paid by the company should be set off against the deemed dividend.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to verify the computation of accumulated profits and determine the quantum of deemed dividend in accordance with the provisions of Section 2(22)(e), considering the exclusion of current year's profits and the set-off of declared dividends. The AO was instructed to provide the assessee with an opportunity of hearing during this process.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates