9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (5) TMI 437 - HC - Income TaxInterest paid to the members without TDS - Co-operative Society engaged in the activities of Co-operative Bank failed to deduct tax at source under the provisions of Section 194A (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 from the interest paid to its member over ₹ 10,000/- - Held that - The said issue is no longer res-integra in view of the CBTD Circular No.19/2015 holding that such Co-operative Banks are not required to deduct tax at source an interest paid on one time deposits by its members, paid or credited on or before 01.06.2015. Also confirmed in CIT vs. Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank 2017 (6) TMI 1218 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT . Taxability of the interest on the bad debts/doubtful debts or NPA (Non- Performing Assets) - interest being actually credited in the Profit and Loss Account of the respondent-Assessee - Held that - The provisions of Section 43D of the Act itself excludes the taxability of the such interest income. Even without recourse to the concept of non- taxability of interest in such cases under Section 43D of the Act, the Division Bench in the case of CIT vs. Canfin Homes Limited (2011 (8) TMI 178 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ) on the basis of the interpretation given to Section 145 providing for Method of Accounting in the Act held that such interest income on bad debts/doubtful debt cannot be taxed, unless it is actually received or credited in the Profit and Loss Account of the assessee concerned in that year.
Issues Involved:
1. Failure to deduct tax at source under Section 194A (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Taxability of interest on bad debts/doubtful debts or Non-Performing Assets (NPAs). Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Failure to Deduct Tax at Source under Section 194A (1) The Revenue appealed against the respondent, a Co-operative Society engaged in banking activities, for failing to deduct tax at source from the interest paid to its members over ?10,000 during the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The disallowance of such interest payments without TDS was argued to be liable under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. Both parties acknowledged that this issue is no longer res integra due to CBDT Circular No. 19/2015, which clarified that Co-operative Banks are not required to deduct tax at source on interest paid on one-time deposits by members, paid or credited on or before 01.06.2015. This Court had previously disposed of similar appeals, citing the decision in CIT vs. Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank, which held that Co-operative Banks were not required to deduct tax on interest payments to members before 01.06.2015. Given the clear instructions from the Ministry of Finance and previous judgments, the Court found no substantial question of law arising from this issue and dismissed the Revenue's appeals. Issue 2: Taxability of Interest on Bad Debts/Doubtful Debts or NPAs The second issue raised by the Revenue was regarding the taxability of interest on bad debts or NPAs by the respondent Co-operative Bank, without the interest being credited in the Profit and Loss Account or actually received. This issue was addressed by the Division Bench in CIT vs. Canfin Homes Limited, which held that if an asset becomes non-performing, it ceases to yield income, and thus, the interest on such assets should not be taxed unless actually received or credited. Section 43D of the Income Tax Act, inserted by the Finance Act, 1991, and amended by the Finance Act, 1999, and further by the Finance Act, 2017, provides that interest on bad debts/doubtful debts is chargeable to tax only when credited to the Profit and Loss Account or actually received. This provision applies to public financial institutions, scheduled banks, and Co-operative Banks. The Court emphasized that the purpose of Section 43D is to protect financial institutions from being taxed on notional income from NPAs. The Division Bench's interpretation of Section 145, which deals with the method of accounting, also supports this view, stating that interest on bad debts/doubtful debts cannot be taxed unless actually received or credited. Following the precedent set by the Division Bench in CIT vs. Canfin Homes Limited and reaffirmed in CIT vs. Urban Co-operative Bank Limited, Shimoga, the Court found no merit in the Revenue's appeals on this issue. The Special Leave Petition against the decision in CIT vs. Urban Co-operative Bank Limited was dismissed by the Supreme Court, leaving the question of law open but not altering the established view. Conclusion: The Court concluded that no substantial question of law arose in the appeals filed by the Revenue. Both issues were thoroughly addressed and settled by previous judgments and CBDT Circulars. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed at the admission stage, with no costs awarded.
|
