2018 (9) TMI 342 - AT - Income Tax

Taxability of sum received as interest on enhanced compensation - interest awarded u/s. 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - enhanced compensation received on acquisition of agricultural lands - Held that - CIT(Appeals) was fully justified in allowing exemption u/s. 10(37) of the Act on the interest received by the assessee u/s. 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. We find no grounds to interfere with the impugned order of the CIT(Appeals). See Movaliya Bhikhubhai Balabhai v. Income-tax Officer-TDS-1-Surat 2016 (5) TMI 488 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT - Decided against revenue

Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of interest on enhanced compensation received under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
2. Applicability of Section 10(37) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for exemption.
3. Interpretation of Sections 56(2)(viii), 57(iv), and 145A(b) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Taxability of Interest on Enhanced Compensation:
The primary issue was whether the interest of ?92,87,258 received by the assessee as part of the enhanced compensation for acquired agricultural land should be taxed. The Assessing Officer (AO) argued that this interest should be taxed under "Income from Other Sources" as per Sections 56(2)(viii) and 145A(b) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The AO added this interest to the total income of the assessee, allowing a 50% deduction under Section 57(iv).

2. Applicability of Section 10(37) for Exemption:
The assessee claimed that the interest received was part of the compensation and thus exempt under Section 10(37) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. Section 10(37) exempts capital gains arising from the compulsory acquisition of agricultural land, provided certain conditions are met, including that the land was used for agricultural purposes and the acquisition was post-1st April 2004.

3. Interpretation of Relevant Sections:
The AO’s stance was based on the provisions of Sections 56(2)(viii), 57(iv), and 145A(b), which state that interest on compensation or enhanced compensation is taxable as "Income from Other Sources" in the year it is received. The AO rejected the exemption claim under Section 10(37), treating the interest as taxable income.

CIT(Appeals) Decision:
The CIT(Appeals) ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the interest awarded under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is in the nature of compensation and falls within the ambit of Section 10(37). Thus, ?90,37,666 out of the total ?92,87,258 was exempt, while the remaining ?2,49,592 was taxable as "Income from Other Sources" with a 50% deduction under Section 57(iv).

Tribunal’s Analysis:
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals) decision, relying on the Gujarat High Court's ruling in Movaliya Bhikhubhai Balabhai v. Income-tax Officer-TDS-1-Surat. The Gujarat High Court had determined that interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act is part of the compensation, not merely interest, and thus should be taxed under Section 45(5) as capital gains, not under "Income from Other Sources."

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the CIT(Appeals) was correct in granting the exemption under Section 10(37) for the interest received under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, confirming that the interest in question was part of the compensation and thus exempt from tax under Section 10(37).

Final Judgment:
The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the CIT(Appeals) order was upheld, confirming the exemption under Section 10(37) for the interest received as part of the enhanced compensation.

← Previous Next →