Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2018 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (10) TMI 994 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Disallowance of employee's contribution to PF and ESI for delay in payment.
2. Interpretation of the due date for depositing employee's contributions.

Issue 1 - Disallowance of employee's contribution to PF and ESI for delay in payment:
The appellant, a private limited company, challenged the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's judgment confirming the disallowance of ?1,16,87,091 under section 2(24)(x) r.w.s. 36(1)(va) for the delay in depositing employee's contributions to PF and ESI. The Assessing Officer made this disallowance as the appellant failed to deposit the deducted contributions with the statutory authorities within the due date. The Assessing Officer considered the deposits made beyond the 20th of the month following the deduction period as delayed, applying the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue 2 - Interpretation of the due date for depositing employee's contributions:
The appellant argued that as per section 38 of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the time limit for depositing contributions within 15 days of the month's close should be based on the month in which the salary payment is made. The appellant contended that if the salary for June is paid on 5th July, the employer has time until 15th August to deposit the employee's contribution to provident fund. However, the court clarified that the due date for depositing contributions within 15 days of the month's close is in relation to the month during which the wages are paid, and the liability to deposit the employee's contribution arises. Therefore, the appellant's argument that the liability gets deferred by another month if wages are paid in the following month was deemed incorrect.

In conclusion, the Tax Appeal was dismissed, upholding the disallowance of employee's contributions to PF and ESI for the delay in payment, and clarifying the interpretation of the due date for depositing employee's contributions based on the month of wage payment.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates