2018 (11) TMI 301 - HC - Central Excise

Pre-deposit - return of the amount deposited in this Court - Held that - The Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Nashik, on considering all the contentions raised by the parties, arrived at a conclusion that the proceedings initiated against the appellant is not sustainable - appeal disposed off.

Summary

Issues: Appeal admission without deposit, subsequent remand order, appeal infructuous, return of deposited amount

The judgment by the Bombay High Court involved several critical issues. Firstly, the applicant/appellant had filed an appeal before the Court without depositing the required amount. The Court admitted the appeal based on substantial questions of law and allowed the appellant to deposit 50% of the duty amount within a specified period. The Division Bench directed the tribunal to proceed with the appeal without insisting on the pre-deposit.

Subsequently, the tribunal remitted the matter back to the authority for fresh consideration. The Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Nashik, after reviewing the contentions, concluded that the proceedings against the appellant were not sustainable. The Commissioner ordered to drop the proceedings initiated against the appellant, making the appeal infructuous.

Upon these developments, the appellant's counsel argued that since the proceedings were dropped, the appeal had become infructuous. The respondents' counsel agreed with this assessment in light of the subsequent orders. Consequently, the appellant requested the return of the amount deposited in the Court due to the appeal becoming irrelevant.

Considering the arguments presented by both parties and the circumstances surrounding the case, the Court disposed of the civil application and the Central Excise Appeal accordingly. The judgment reflects the Court's decision based on the subsequent events and the request for the return of the deposited amount in light of the appeal becoming infructuous.