Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2018 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (11) TMI 763 - AT - Customs


Issues involved:
1. Mandatory predeposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for an appeal against a rejection letter.
2. Extension of time for installation of machinery imported under EPCG Scheme.

Analysis:
1. The judgment addressed the issue of mandatory predeposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for an appeal against a rejection letter. The appellant had filed an appeal against a rejection letter issued by the Commissioner of Customs, Cochin, regarding the extension of time for installation of machinery imported under the EPCG Scheme. The appellant argued that there was no demand of duty, interest, or penalty involved in the appeal, and hence, mandatory predeposit should not be required. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, stating that since there was no demand of duty, interest, or penalty in the case, the mandatory predeposit under Section 35F was not necessary, and the appeal was taken on record.

2. The judgment also delved into the issue of extension of time for installation of machinery imported under the EPCG Scheme. The appellants, a Government of Kerala undertaking, were installing Pollution Control Equipments and had obtained EPCG licenses to import capital goods for the projects. Due to financial constraints, they could not complete the installation within the initially granted time frame. Despite an extension granted by the Tribunal earlier, the installation remained incomplete, leading to a rejection of further extension by the Additional Commissioner of Customs. The appellant contended that the rejection lacked detailed grounds and violated principles of natural justice. After considering submissions from both sides, the Tribunal noted the genuine fund difficulty faced by the appellants and granted an extension of time until 31/12/2018 for the installation, directing them to complete it within the specified period. The judgment highlighted the appellant's reliance on government funds and the diversion of funds towards setting up a neutralization plant as contributing factors to the delay in installation.

In conclusion, the judgment resolved the issues of mandatory predeposit and extension of time for installation of imported machinery under the EPCG Scheme in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the genuine difficulties faced and granting the requested extension based on the circumstances presented.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates