Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2018 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (11) TMI 1480 - HC - Customs


Issues:
Setting aside the conviction order under sections 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act by Additional Sessions Judge, suspension of the substantive sentence, comparison of petitioner's role with co-accused, imposition of additional fine, reduction of sentence, release of passport.

Analysis:
The petitioner sought setting aside of the order dated 19.08.2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, upholding his conviction under sections 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's order dated 09.04.2002. The petitioner appealed against the conviction, which was dismissed, leading to the present petition before the High Court.

The petitioner was convicted for evading customs duties on certain household items, sentenced to 6 months of rigorous imprisonment with a fine on each count. The petitioner's counsel did not challenge the conviction but requested suspension of the substantive sentence due to the petitioner's age and partial imprisonment served. The petitioner's role was compared to that of a co-accused, Ms. Rosy Chawla, who had a similar case where a remaining sentence was waived after serving a short imprisonment period.

The respondent's counsel did not contest the petitioner's entitlement to similar treatment as the co-accused but suggested an additional fine. The court examined the petitioner's involvement, noting that he helped clear customs formalities for goods belonging to Ms. Rosy Chawla, mis-declaring them as personal items for transfer of residence. The court found the petitioner's culpability to be on a similar or lower level compared to the co-accused.

The court, considering the facts and previous judgments, affirmed the conviction but reduced the sentence to the period already served. An additional fine of ?25,000 was imposed, and the remaining sentence was waived. The respondent was directed to release the petitioner's passport upon proof of the fine payment.

In conclusion, the court disposed of the petition and related applications, maintaining the conviction but reducing the sentence and imposing an additional fine while granting the release of the petitioner's passport upon compliance.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates