2018 (12) TMI 796 - AT - Customs

Misappropriation of government revenue (import duty) - Demand raised against the importer while no proceedings against the officers - Irregularities in import through Land Customs Station, Khowaighat under Agartala Customs Division - Held that - It is evident from the final enquiry report filed by the Additional Commissioner, Customs and it is quite surprising to note that there is nothing on record in the hands of the officers posted at Khowaighat LCS to prove the case and all documents are only to be obtained from the Bangladesh customs department but most unfortunately till date nothing has been received from the Bangladesh Customs. Such plea as adopted herein is not at all tenable in the eye of law. There is nothing on record to show what disciplinary action has been taken by the customs department against the officers who were on duty during the period when such irregularities and infirmities in maintenance of Government records took place - it is also evident from the final report that the investigation cannot be proceeded with any further until documents pertaining to export are received from Bangladesh Customs Department. Appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant.

Issues:
1. Misappropriation of government revenue (import duty) at Land Customs Station, Khowaighat, Tripura.
2. Allegations of non-payment of customs duty for imported goods.
3. Barred proceedings due to limitation period.
4. Lack of evidence and delay in investigation from Bangladesh Customs Department.
5. Disciplinary action against officers involved in irregularities.

Analysis:
1. The judgment revolves around the misappropriation of government revenue through non-payment of customs duty at the Land Customs Station, Khowaighat, Tripura. The appellants imported goods under valid licenses, but the customs duty was allegedly misappropriated by officers at the station. The Commissioner issued orders confirming the demand for customs duties, interest, and imposing penalties on the appellants individually. However, no confiscation of goods was ordered due to unavailability.

2. The dispute involved allegations of non-payment of customs duty for imported cement through Balla Land Customs Station, Bangladesh to Land Customs Station, Khowaighat, Tripura. The appellants argued that they had deposited the duty at the time of import, but the officers sometimes did not issue TR-V, leading to discrepancies. The show cause notices were issued after a significant delay from the date of discovery of the misappropriation, raising the issue of proceedings being barred by the limitation period.

3. The judgment highlighted the lack of evidence and delay in the investigation process, particularly in obtaining crucial documents from the Bangladesh Customs Department. The final enquiry report indicated that the investigation was dependent on foreign documents, and no progress was made due to non-receipt of essential information. The six-month investigation period guideline was deemed inapplicable in this foreign document-dependent case, leading to a dormant investigation and flawed orders.

4. The judgment criticized the lack of disciplinary action against the officers responsible for the irregularities and emphasized the need for accountability within the customs department. The absence of evidence to support actions taken against the officers during the period of misappropriation raised concerns about the integrity and effectiveness of the department's internal controls. The delay in the investigation and the dependency on foreign documents were deemed unacceptable in the eyes of the law.

5. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, ruling in favor of the appellants due to the lack of evidence, delay in investigation, and procedural flaws. The judgment underscored the importance of timely and thorough investigations, accountability within the customs department, and adherence to legal procedures in cases involving allegations of revenue misappropriation.

← Previous Next →