Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2018 (12) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (12) TMI 1399 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Technical knowhow expenditure treated as revenue expenditure
2. Taxability of profit from US and UK branches
3. Restoration of taxability issue of sale tax exemption benefit
4. Entertaining additional ground without prior mention

Analysis:

1. Technical Knowhow Expenditure:
The issue revolved around whether technical knowhow expenditure should be considered as revenue or capital expenditure. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in light of a previous judgment. The Revenue objected, arguing that the issue was raised for the first time before the Tribunal. However, the Court held that as long as material exists on record, a new contention can be raised. The Court emphasized that the nature of the expenditure determines its treatment, irrespective of the amendment in Section 32. Ultimately, the Court did not entertain this question.

2. Taxability of Profit from US and UK Branches:
The Assessing Officer attempted to tax the income from the assessee's units in the USA and UK. However, the CIT(A) and Tribunal ruled that this income was not taxable in India, citing Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements. The Revenue challenged this decision, but the Court noted that similar issues were previously decided in favor of the assessee. The Court held that without any new distinctions in facts, the Revenue could not challenge the issue further. The Court dismissed the tax appeal on this ground.

3. Restoration of Taxability Issue of Sale Tax Exemption Benefit:
The Tribunal restored the issue of taxability of sale tax exemption benefit back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Revenue objected, claiming that the issue was raised for the first time before the Tribunal. The Court noted that the Tribunal had the authority to remand the issue for fresh assessment. The Court highlighted that the Revenue had previously challenged similar orders but failed to provide any distinguishing features for the current assessment year. The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal's decision.

4. Entertaining Additional Ground Without Prior Mention:
The Tribunal entertained an additional ground raised by the assessee, concerning the treatment of sales tax exemption benefit as revenue receipt. The Revenue objected, stating that the issue had attained finality and should not have been permitted. The Court held that if material exists on record, a new contention can be raised. The Court emphasized that it was for the assessee to present relevant clauses of the subsidy for assessment. The Court dismissed this question, emphasizing the need for a decision in accordance with the law.

In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal on various grounds, including technical knowhow expenditure, taxability of profit from overseas branches, restoration of taxability issues, and entertaining additional grounds. The Court's decision was based on legal interpretations, previous judgments, and the need for proper assessment in line with the law.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates