Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2019 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (2) TMI 239 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Interpretation of Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding interest payable on refunds.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Interpretation of Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding interest payable on refunds

The case involved a dispute over the interest payable on refunds to an Association of Persons (AoP) engaged in civil construction. The AoP followed the project completion method of accounting and claimed a refund for certain payments made during the Assessment Years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06. The Assessing Officer's order resulted in a refund, but the Revenue contended that interest could not be paid for any period before the Assessment Year 2005-06 since the income related to the payments was declared in that year. The Tribunal, relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Union of India v/s. Tata Chemicals Ltd., held in favor of the Assessee, leading to the Revenue's appeal.

The Court analyzed the relevant statutory provisions, including Section 199C, Section 194C, Section 199, and Section 244A of the Act. Section 244A provides for interest on refunds in different scenarios. The Court noted that the case fell under clause (a) of subsection 1 of Section 244A, which covers refunds related to tax collected at source, advance tax, or tax treated as paid under Section 199. The Court emphasized that interest should be calculated from the 1st day of April of the Assessment Year in such cases. Referring to the Supreme Court's judgment in Tata Chemicals Ltd., the Court reiterated the principles governing interest on refunds, emphasizing that interest is a statutory obligation and not discretionary. The Court highlighted that the State's obligation to refund excess tax includes paying interest for the period of undue retention of such monies.

In conclusion, the Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision that interest on the refund was payable from the 1st day of April of the Assessment Year. The Court's analysis underscored the statutory framework governing interest on refunds and the obligation of the Revenue to reimburse excess tax with accrued interest.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates