9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (4) TMI 1172 - HC - Income TaxReopening of assessment u/s 148 - notice in the name of a deceased person - HELD THAT - Department had due notice about the death of the assessee, inasmuch as other proceedings under the Act had been taken against the petitioner as the legal heir of deceased assessee. Thus, despite the fact that the Department was well aware of the death of the assessee, the impugned notice under section 148 of the Act came to be issued to the deceased assessee and not to the heir and legal representative of the deceased. The impugned notice dated 29.03.2018 under section 148 of the Act which is a jurisdictional notice, having been issued in the name of a deceased person is invalid and lacks jurisdiction and, therefore, cannot be sustained. See CHANDRESHBHAI JAYANTIBHAI PATEL VERSUS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 2019 (1) TMI 353 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT - Decided against revenue.
Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to a deceased person. 2. Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated against the deceased person can be continued against the legal representative. 3. Applicability of section 292B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to cure the defect in the notice issued to a deceased person. Detailed Analysis: 1. Validity of the Notice Issued Under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to a Deceased Person: The petitioner challenged the notice dated 29.03.2018 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the ground that it was issued in the name of a deceased person, Shri Brijeshkumar Parsottambhai Ukani, and hence, was invalid. The court noted that the assessee had passed away on 23.01.2011, and the Department was aware of this fact, as evidenced by previous proceedings where notices were issued to the petitioner as the legal heir. Despite this knowledge, the notice for the assessment year 2011-12 was issued to the deceased person. The court held that a notice under section 148 issued to a dead person is invalid and lacks jurisdiction, as it is a jurisdictional notice necessary for the Assessing Officer to assume jurisdiction under section 147 of the Act. 2. Whether the Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Against the Deceased Person Can Be Continued Against the Legal Representative: The court examined the provisions of section 159 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which deals with legal representatives. It was noted that subsection (2)(b) of section 159 allows proceedings to be taken against the legal representative, which could have been taken against the deceased if he had survived. However, in this case, the proceedings were initiated against the deceased person, not the legal representative. The court referred to its decision in Chandreshbhai Jayantibhai Patel v. Income Tax Officer, where it was held that proceedings pursuant to a notice issued to a dead person cannot be continued against the legal representative. The court emphasized that the legal representative had not waived the requirement of notice under section 148 and had objected to the validity of the notice from the beginning. 3. Applicability of Section 292B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to Cure the Defect in the Notice Issued to a Deceased Person: The respondent argued that the defect in the notice could be cured under section 292B of the Act, which provides that no notice shall be invalid merely by reason of any mistake, defect, or omission if it is in substance and effect in conformity with the intent and purpose of the Act. The court, however, distinguished the present case from those where legal representatives had participated in the proceedings. It held that a notice under section 148 issued to a dead person is not in conformity with the intent and purpose of the Act, as it affects the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer. The court concluded that section 292B would not apply to cure the defect in such a notice. Conclusion: The court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned notice dated 29.03.2018 issued under section 148 of the Act and all proceedings taken pursuant thereto. The notice was deemed invalid as it was issued to a deceased person, and the reassessment proceedings could not be continued against the legal representative based on such an invalid notice. The provisions of section 292B were held inapplicable in this context.
|
