Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (4) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (4) TMI 1604 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues: Admission of petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, appointment of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), confirmation of IRP as Resolution Professional (RP), non-cooperation of debtor, committee of creditors meetings, valuation of assets, extension of CIRP period, loans and advances during CIRP, application for liquidation, valuation reports, recommendation for liquidation, claims received from creditors, appointment of liquidator.

Admission of Petition and Appointment of IRP: The petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 filed by the Financial Creditor was admitted, and Mr. Rajeev Mannadiar was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) for the Outstanding Amount of ?1,21,17,752/- related to Inventory Funding Facility.

Confirmation of RP and Debtor Cooperation: The IRP appointed by the Bench was confirmed as the Resolution Professional (RP) by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) in the first meeting. Despite non-cooperation from the Promoter/Director, un-audited financial statements for the relevant years were obtained.

Committee of Creditors Meetings and Valuation of Assets: Multiple Committee of Creditors meetings were held to discuss auditing of financial statements, valuation of assets, and extension of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period. The RP informed about summons received from the High Court and decisions made regarding asset valuation and inviting Expression of Interest for the Company.

Liquidation Process: As no Resolution Plan was proposed or approved, the RP proposed liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, which was agreed upon by the Committee of Creditors. Claims were received from various creditors during the Resolution Process, leading to the RP filing an application for liquidation.

Appointment of Liquidator: The Committee of Creditors did not recommend the RP to be the Liquidator, and the RP expressed unwillingness to continue in that role. Consequently, the Bench ordered the commencement of the liquidation process, renaming the RP as the "Liquidator" as per the provisions of the Code, and instructed the Liquidator to advertise the liquidation in newspapers and seek directions if necessary during the process.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates